What impact did social networks and messaging apps have on their audiences in the weeks leading up to the elections? From providing various possibilities such as live broadcasting to creating a space for discussion and debate and heating up various topics, this year's presidential election is one of the first examples of citizens accessing free information circulation on the brink of a political transformation. However, in the absence of professional oversight, how reliable are all the news circulated in cyberspace, or how much of this news is tainted with fake news and propaganda for various sides? On the other hand, the question is how much did the virtual space play a role in the sudden rise and fall of candidates? In this context, Samira Ghorai's report, along with four experts, looks into these issues and questions. The experts on this program include: Omid Memarian - journalist and graduate of journalism from Berkeley University, Amir Rashidi, internet security researcher, Kazem Alamdari - sociologist and author of the book 'Why Iran Lagged Behind and the West Advanced', Glenn Kitz - social media expert at Radio Free Europe. In this regard, the 'ifs and buts' about the future of the JCPOA on the eve of the elections in Iran, Khamenei and the 2017 elections, the economy, the main loser of the third electoral debate, special page for the 2017 elections. Follow the news and reports related to the 2017 elections on the special page of Radio Farda.
Messaging Apps, Social Networks, and the 2017 Elections
The article discusses the influence of social media and messaging apps on the Iranian presidential elections in 2017, highlighting their role in information dissemination and public discourse. It raises concerns about the reliability of information in the absence of professional oversight and examines the impact of these platforms on the candidates' fortunes. This is significant as it reflects the evolving landscape of political communication in Iran.
👥 Key Players
📰 What Happened
The article discusses the role of social networks and messaging apps in shaping public discourse during the 2017 Iranian presidential elections. It highlights concerns over the reliability of information and the impact of these platforms on candidates' fortunes.
- Social media provided a platform for live broadcasting and public debate.
- Concerns were raised about the prevalence of fake news and propaganda.
💡 Why It Matters
📚 Background
Iran has a complex political system where elections are significant yet often scrutinized for fairness. The rise of social media has changed how citizens engage with politics.
🏷️ Entities Mentioned
Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →
Translation confidence: 85%