Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Mohammad Khatami Criticizes Guardian Council's Vote

Feb 10, 2026 February 10, 2026 1 min read 📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway

Mohammad Khatami has criticized the Guardian Council for vetoing a law that would expand presidential powers. This conflict highlights the ongoing power struggle between conservatives and reformists in Iran. The outcome is significant for Khatami's reform agenda and civil liberties in the country.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The clash between Khatami and the Guardian Council reflects the deep divisions in Iranian politics and the ongoing struggle for reform.

👥 Key Players

Mohammad Khatami MENTIONED
President of Iran
"Khatami is a key figure in the reformist movement, advocating for civil liberties and political reforms since his election in 1997."
Guardian Council MENTIONED
Conservative body of the Islamic Republic
"The Guardian Council holds significant power in Iran, including the ability to veto legislation and disqualify election candidates, thus influencing the political landscape."

📰 What Happened

Mohammad Khatami criticized the Guardian Council for vetoing a law that would have expanded presidential powers, arguing that the council's changes limit the president's authority excessively. This conflict underscores the ongoing struggle between conservative and reformist factions in Iran.

  • The proposed law aimed to delegate more authority to the president to protect reformist media and activists.
  • The Guardian Council has historically obstructed Khatami's reform agenda since his presidency began.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: This conflict highlights the challenges faced by reformists in Iran and the ongoing limitations on civil liberties and political freedoms.
🌍 Regional: The power struggle may affect Iran's regional policies and its relations with neighboring countries, particularly regarding reformist versus conservative governance.
🌐 International: The situation in Iran is closely watched by international observers, as it impacts global perceptions of democracy and human rights in the region.

📚 Background

Since the Islamic Revolution in 1979, Iran has experienced a tug-of-war between conservative and reformist factions, with the Guardian Council often acting to maintain conservative control over political processes.

Iranian political structure Civil liberties in Iran
📡 Source: NEUTRAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
This article presents a straightforward account of the political conflict without overt bias, but readers should consider the broader context of Iranian media.

Mohammad Khatami, the President of Iran, has criticized the Guardian Council, a conservative body of the Islamic Republic, for vetoing a law aimed at expanding the powers of the presidency. Khatami stated that the proposed changes by the Guardian Council to the discussed bill, which seeks to limit the president's authority, are unacceptable. He argued that the Guardian Council restricts the president's powers to such an extent that in some respects, they are even more limited than those of an ordinary citizen. One of the bills passed by the parliament aims to delegate authority to the president so that he can prevent the closure of reformist newspapers and the judicial prosecution of reformist activists. Another bill seeks to prevent the Guardian Council from disqualifying election candidates. Recent developments are part of the power struggle between the regime's conservatives and reformists, which has been a defining feature of Khatami's presidency. Conservatives have exploited their dominance over various government institutions to obstruct Khatami's desired reforms since his election in 1997. Khatami had promised to expand civil liberties in Iran. Conservatives insist that their opposition to reforms is to uphold the principles of the Islamic Revolution.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →