Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Motahari Calls for Referral of Parliament's Resolution on Disqualified Candidates to the Expediency Council

Jan 28, 2026 January 28, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

Ali Motahari, Deputy Speaker of the Iranian Parliament, has called for the Parliament's resolution on disqualifying candidates after elections to be sent to the Expediency Council for final judgment. If approved, this could allow Minou Khalighi, who was previously sidelined, to enter the Parliament. This situation highlights ongoing tensions between the Parliament and the Guardian Council regarding candidate qualifications.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The ongoing conflict between the Parliament and the Guardian Council could reshape the political landscape in Iran.

👥 Key Players

Ali Motahari MENTIONED
Deputy Speaker of the Iranian Parliament
"Motahari is a significant political figure advocating for parliamentary authority and reform in candidate qualification processes."
Guardian Council MENTIONED
Powerful body overseeing elections and candidate qualifications
"The Guardian Council has the authority to disqualify candidates, influencing the political landscape and electoral integrity."
Minou Khalighi MENTIONED
Disqualified candidate
"Khalighi's case represents broader issues of electoral fairness and the role of oversight bodies in Iran."
Expediency Council MENTIONED
Advisory body for resolving disputes between different branches of government
"This Council plays a crucial role in mediating conflicts between the Parliament and the Guardian Council."

📰 What Happened

Ali Motahari has requested that a parliamentary resolution regarding the disqualification of candidates after elections be sent to the Expediency Council for final judgment. This request follows repeated rejections of the resolution by the Guardian Council and aims to potentially reinstate Minou Khalighi as a member of Parliament.

  • The Guardian Council has rejected the Parliament's resolution twice.
  • The Parliament's resolution argues that disqualifications should not occur after elections.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: This situation highlights the struggle for parliamentary authority and the legitimacy of elected representatives in Iran.
🌍 Regional: The outcome may influence perceptions of democracy and governance in the region, particularly among neighboring countries.
🌐 International: International observers may view this as a test of Iran's political reform and electoral integrity.

📚 Background

The Guardian Council's role in disqualifying candidates has been a contentious issue in Iranian politics, often leading to public protests and calls for reform. This case exemplifies the ongoing debate over electoral oversight and candidate rights.

Electoral reform in Iran The role of the Guardian Council in Iranian politics
📡 Source: STATE MEDIA
📊 Confidence: 70%
The source is likely to reflect the government's perspective, emphasizing parliamentary authority while downplaying opposition viewpoints.

On Wednesday, February 1, the Deputy Speaker of the Islamic Consultative Assembly, Ali Motahari, requested that the Parliament's resolution regarding the prohibition of disqualifying elected candidates after elections be sent to the Expediency Council for final judgment. In an interview with ISNA, he stated that the Parliament's insistence on its resolution, despite being rejected twice by the Guardian Council, indicates that it should be referred to the Expediency Council. If the Council votes in favor of the Parliament, 'considering that legally, the inquiry is retroactive and includes the past,' Minou Khalighi, who was unjustly sidelined, can enter the Parliament. The Islamic Consultative Assembly had interpreted Clause 3 of Article 52 of the Election Law concerning the confirmation of candidates' qualifications during its session on September 7. According to the Parliament's interpretation, the Guardian Council can only disqualify candidates within the timeframe specified by the Election Law and should not disqualify a candidate after their election. However, on September 20, the Guardian Council announced that it had rejected the mentioned plan and returned it to the Parliament for corrections. The Iranian Parliament subsequently amended this resolution, but the new resolution was also rejected by the Guardian Council. The Parliament also approved that part of the inquiry be 'clarified' in the commissions and presented again in the public session. This section of the inquiry was also approved in the public session on January 30 after review in the Parliament's commissions. In their new resolution, the Parliament representatives emphasized that the Guardian Council cannot make further comments on the qualifications of that candidate or elected representative after declaring the validity of the elections in the electoral district. According to this resolution, if new documents regarding the candidates reach this Council, these documents must be reviewed according to the internal regulations of the Parliament during the examination of the elected representatives' credentials. The Guardian Council has not commented on the new resolution from the Parliament. The interpretation plan of Clause 3 of Article 52 of the Parliament's Election Law was presented after a disagreement between the Guardian Council and the Ministry of Interior regarding the 'annulment' of Minou Khalighi's votes, which some representatives refer to as disqualification after the elections. On June 25, Ali Larijani, the Speaker of the Parliament, referred to the disagreement regarding Ms. Khalighi and stated that the Guardian Council cannot extend its oversight to after the elections. Meanwhile, Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati, the Secretary of the Guardian Council, stated on May 11 that this body can disqualify individuals even after the elections. Following the government's opposition to the 'annulment' of Minou Khalighi's votes and the insistence of both parties on their positions, the matter was referred to the dispute resolution body between the three branches, which ruled in favor of the Guardian Council. The issue of 'supervisory oversight' and the performance of the Guardian Council in reviewing the qualifications of candidates in all parliamentary and presidential election cycles has caused significant protests, yet this Council continues to disqualify many candidates in all election cycles. According to Article 99 of the Constitution, the Guardian Council is responsible for overseeing all elections except for council elections, and according to the interpretation provided by this Council of this article, this oversight is 'supervisory and includes all executive stages of elections, including the approval and disqualification of candidates.'

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →