Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

New York Supreme Court Orders Return of Achaemenid Artifact to Iran

Jan 25, 2026 January 25, 2026 2 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

A New York court has ordered the return of a 500 BC Achaemenid bas-relief to Iran, which was seized from an art exhibition last year. The artifact was illegally taken from Iran in 1936 and later stolen from a Canadian museum. This ruling highlights ongoing legal battles over cultural heritage and artifacts taken from Iran.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The return of the artifact underscores the importance of legal frameworks in resolving cultural heritage disputes.

👥 Key Players

New York Supreme Court MENTIONED
Judicial authority
"Their ruling determines the legal status of international cultural artifacts."
Rupert Wace MENTIONED
Antiquities dealer
"Involved in the purchase and attempted sale of the Achaemenid artifact."
Manhattan District Attorney's Office MENTIONED
Law enforcement agency
"Seized the artifact and initiated legal proceedings."

📰 What Happened

A New York court ordered the return of a 500 BC Achaemenid bas-relief to Iran. The artifact was seized from an art exhibition after being identified as stolen property.

  • The artifact was illegally taken from Iran in 1936.
  • It was stolen from the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts in 2011.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: This ruling supports Iran's efforts to reclaim cultural heritage and reinforces its legal rights over historical artifacts.
🌍 Regional: Sets a precedent for other Middle Eastern countries seeking to recover cultural artifacts.
🌐 International: Highlights the complexities of international law regarding cultural property and the responsibilities of art dealers.

📚 Background

The Achaemenid Empire was one of the most significant ancient Persian empires, and its artifacts are highly valued. Legal battles over such artifacts are common as countries seek to reclaim their cultural heritage.

Cultural heritage repatriation International art law
📡 Source: INTERNATIONAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The New York Times is generally considered a reliable source, providing a Western perspective on international legal matters.

A New York Supreme Court judge ruled on Monday, July 23, that a bas-relief depicting an Achaemenid soldier should be returned to Iran. According to the New York Times, this stone relief, dating back to approximately 500 BC, was seized last October by agents from the Manhattan District Attorney's Office from an art exhibition called "Park Avenue Armory" that intended to auction the Achaemenid piece for $1.2 million. Researchers stated that this Achaemenid artifact was illegally taken from Iran in 1936 and was stolen from the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts in Canada in 2011. Reports indicate that the court will not pursue the two buyers of the piece. Rupert Wace, a well-known antiquities dealer, and his partner Sam Fagg claimed they legally purchased the ancient artifact from the Montreal museum's insurance company, but after investigations revealed its stolen status, they agreed to sign court documents regarding the piece. Mr. Wace had stated in an email last year during the seizure that researchers are well aware of this artwork and its 70-year history. The U.S. Supreme Court also ruled last March that Americans injured in the 1997 bombing in Jerusalem, who claim Iran's involvement in the attack, cannot seize Achaemenid tablets at the University of Chicago Museum to cover their $71.5 million damages. The Achaemenid tablets, which include over 30,000 tablets, were sent to the University of Chicago's Oriental Institute by ship in 1935 based on a government resolution and arrived there in 1937. It was intended that expert examinations and studies on these tablets would be conducted within three years and they would be returned to Iran. After translations and publications of some of these tablets by American experts, several were returned to Iran in three batches in 1948, 1971, and 2004, but this return process was halted due to a legal issue related to a terrorist attack in Jerusalem implicating Iran.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 90%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →