Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

On the Line with Eric Felten: How to Advance the War on Terrorism - 2002-05-11

Feb 13, 2026 February 13, 2026 2 min read 📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway

Eric Felten discusses the ongoing threat of terrorism and the need for a new strategy to combat it, highlighting the diminished but still present danger from al-Qaeda and rogue states like Iraq. Experts emphasize the importance of addressing state sponsors of terrorism and the potential for advanced weaponry to be used by terrorists. This discussion is crucial for understanding U.S. foreign policy and security concerns post-9/11.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The ongoing threat of terrorism necessitates a reevaluation of strategies to combat both terrorist networks and their state sponsors.

👥 Key Players

Eric Felten MENTIONED
Host of On the Line
"Felten provides a platform for discussing U.S. strategies against terrorism, influencing public perception and policy."
Neil Livingston MENTIONED
President of Global Options
"Livingston's insights on security highlight the ongoing risks posed by terrorism and state sponsors, relevant to U.S. foreign policy."
Mr. Donovan MENTIONED
Expert on terrorism and weapons
"His expertise on the complexities of biological and chemical weapons informs discussions on national security."
Osama bin Laden MENTIONED
Leader of al-Qaeda
"Bin Laden's actions and network are central to understanding the motivations behind U.S. counterterrorism efforts."
President George Bush MENTIONED
U.S. President at the time
"Bush's policies and statements shape the U.S. approach to terrorism and foreign relations, particularly with rogue states."

📰 What Happened

Eric Felten discusses the ongoing threat of terrorism and the need for a new strategy to combat it, emphasizing the role of state sponsors like Iraq. Experts warn that while al-Qaeda's safe haven in Afghanistan is gone, the threat remains due to potential support from rogue states.

  • Al-Qaeda still poses a threat despite losing its base in Afghanistan.
  • The discussion highlights concerns about rogue states providing weapons of mass destruction to terrorists.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Iran's role as a perceived state sponsor of terrorism makes discussions about rogue states particularly relevant to its geopolitical stance.
🌍 Regional: The Middle East is a hotspot for terrorism and state-sponsored violence, affecting regional stability and security.
🌐 International: The U.S. stance on terrorism influences international relations, particularly with countries like Iraq and Iran, impacting global security dynamics.

📚 Background

The post-9/11 era marked a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy, focusing on counterterrorism and the identification of state sponsors of terrorism.

War on Terror Weapons of Mass Destruction
📡 Source: NEUTRAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The discussion presents expert opinions and reflects a range of views on terrorism and security without overt bias.

On the Line with Eric Felten: How to Advance the War on Terrorism - 2002-05-11. This week, Eric Felten discusses the new strategy for the war on terrorism with two experts. Osama bin Laden and his terrorist network, al-Qaeda, no longer have the safe haven they once enjoyed in Afghanistan. However, this does not mean that al-Qaeda or other terrorist groups are no longer a threat. Neil Livingston, president of Global Options, a private security company, speaks on this matter, stating: 'We will be attacked again, next week, next month, next year, or two years from now. Why? Simply because we do not have the capability to protect everything that needs protection. Therefore, we must delve into the core issue and confront the state sponsors of terrorism and uproot terrorist networks wherever they are. We must deal with them effectively.' Mr. Donovan, following Livingston's remarks, says that the dissemination of biological or chemical weapons is very difficult; hence, we must consider that such actions require advanced technology and knowledge, as well as complex processes and sophisticated tools. Eric Felten states: 'Unfortunately, rogue states may provide such weapons to terrorists. There is evidence that one of the September 11 hijackers had previously been hospitalized due to skin contamination with anthrax. Livingston adds: 'Most law enforcement officials do not consider this a coincidence. This hijacker was hospitalized in Florida, near the office of a newspaper that was among the first to be exposed to anthrax.' Mohammed Atta, the leader of the September 11 terrorist operation, had met with an Iraqi intelligence officer in the Czech Republic. Therefore, it could be said that the Iraqis may have provided anthrax to the terrorists. Felten, the host of On the Line, states that rogue states such as Iraq are advancing their programs for producing weapons of mass destruction and supporting terrorism. For this reason, President George Bush states that the United States will not allow the world's most dangerous weapons to fall into the hands of the most dangerous regimes.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →