In response to the negative reactions regarding various aspects of the 'Hijab and Chastity' bill from the Judicial Commission of the Parliament, many believe that several provisions of this bill, including the definition of 'bad hijab penalties for drivers', are pitting people against each other. The website 'Tejarat News' reported in an article that one of the provisions of this bill imposes a 500,000 Toman fine on drivers for the 'bad hijab' or 'non-hijab' of passengers. It stated, 'This bill has not yet been approved, but some drivers have experiences regarding penalties for bad hijab or trip cancellations by passengers after hijab reminders, and they do not find these issues fair.' According to this website, some drivers, especially those in internet-based transportation, believe such actions incite conflict between drivers and passengers, causing discomfort. They also noted that some passengers cancel trips or give low ratings to drivers due to reminders about bad hijab, which harms the drivers. Article 54 of the Hijab and Chastity bill states: 'Anyone driving a motor vehicle who commits indecency, uncovers hijab, is improperly veiled, or carries someone committing the aforementioned offenses will be fined five million rials by traffic police. The issuance of a fine for the mentioned vehicle does not negate the application of penalties for the offender. This article also applies to taxis and internet-based transport services.' In response to the revised 'Hijab and Chastity' bill in the Islamic Consultative Assembly, a lawyer stated: 'This bill is confrontational, not interactive, and it is blatantly a violation of human rights and freedoms.' Hossein Bayat, a senior lawyer, emphasized that 'this bill is not compatible with what is happening in reality and is unlikely to succeed,' adding: 'In this bill, legal principles, laws, theoretical foundations, educational, sociological, and psychological bases have not been observed, and it seems that, as in the past, the representatives' focus is more on preserving the ideological identity of the political system than addressing societal issues and problems.' Following the death of Mahsa Amini in the custody of the morality police, many girls and women have refrained from adhering to the mandatory hijab as prescribed by the Islamic Republic. In contrast, confrontations with opponents of the mandatory hijab have intensified in cities across Iran. Nonetheless, images and videos circulated on social media indicate the continuation of civil resistance among girls and women in Iran. Mohammad Hossein Aghasi: The Hijab and Chastity bill has been hastily prepared. The municipality of Mashhad, 'following the Taliban'; the use of outdoor spaces of restaurants and cafes has been banned. Continuing criticism of the 'Hijab and Chastity' bill; users say it is a way for the government to generate income. A warning from the commander of the IRGC about the repetition of protests and the 'strongest struggle' against the Islamic Republic. Continuing criticisms of the 'Chastity and Hijab' bill; a legal expert calls it 'damaging and terrifying.' Implicit reaction from Ejei to the 'sexual scandals' in Gilan: Problems should be solved within the family. Criticism from a parliamentary representative: The minimum fine for 'improper veiling and non-hijab' is 7 million Toman.
Opposition to Driver Penalties Under the Pretext of 'Passenger Bad Hijab' in Hijab Bill; Pitting People Against Each Other
The proposed 'Hijab and Chastity' bill has sparked significant backlash, particularly regarding penalties imposed on drivers for passengers' hijab violations. Critics argue that the bill exacerbates tensions between drivers and passengers and infringes on individual rights. This matter is crucial as it reflects ongoing societal resistance to mandatory hijab laws in Iran.
👥 Key Players
📰 What Happened
The Iranian Parliament is considering a 'Hijab and Chastity' bill that includes penalties for drivers if their passengers violate hijab laws. This has sparked backlash due to concerns about fairness and societal division.
- The bill proposes a fine of 500,000 Toman for drivers if passengers are improperly veiled.
- Critics argue the bill incites conflict and violates human rights.
💡 Why It Matters
📚 Background
Iran has strict laws on dress codes, particularly for women, which have been a point of contention and protest, especially after the death of Mahsa Amini in custody.
Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →
Translation confidence: 85%