Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Papua: We Will Use Force If Necessary to Evacuate Manus Camp

Jan 27, 2026 January 27, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

Papua New Guinea officials have begun evacuating the Manus refugee camp, threatening to use force against the 600 migrants if they do not leave voluntarily. The situation has drawn international concern due to the lack of basic necessities and fears of violence among the refugees. This highlights ongoing issues with Australia's refugee policies and their humanitarian implications.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The forced evacuation of Manus camp refugees raises significant humanitarian and policy concerns on a global scale.

👥 Key Players

Papua New Guinea officials MENTIONED
Government authorities
"They are responsible for the management and enforcement of the evacuation of the Manus camp."
Behrouz Boochani MENTIONED
Kurdish Iranian refugee and journalist
"He is a prominent voice providing firsthand accounts and raising awareness about the conditions in the Manus camp."
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) MENTIONED
International organization
"They are advocating for the rights and welfare of the refugees, highlighting humanitarian concerns."
Australian Government MENTIONED
Policy maker for refugee detention
"Their policies have led to the establishment of offshore detention centers like Manus Island."

📰 What Happened

Papua New Guinea officials have initiated the evacuation of the Manus refugee camp, threatening to use force if the 600 migrants do not leave voluntarily. The situation is tense due to lack of basic necessities and fears of violence.

  • The Manus camp has been closed since October 31, with utilities cut off.
  • Refugees are resisting evacuation due to fear of violence and inadequate alternative accommodations.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: The situation highlights the plight of Iranian refugees and could influence public opinion and policy discussions on migration in Iran.
🌍 Regional: The event underscores regional tensions over refugee management and Australia's role in the Pacific.
🌐 International: It draws international attention to Australia's refugee policies, which have been widely criticized by human rights organizations.

📚 Background

Australia has used offshore detention centers like Manus Island to deter asylum seekers arriving by boat, a policy criticized for its harsh conditions.

Australia's refugee policies International human rights concerns
📡 Source: INTERNATIONAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
Reuters is generally considered a reliable source, providing international coverage with a focus on factual reporting.

Papua New Guinea officials announced that with the beginning of the dismantling of the Manus camp, they will resort to force if necessary to evacuate the camp of 600 illegal migrants. Reuters reported on Thursday (November 9) that the evacuation operation of this detention center for refugees has begun today. According to the report, Papua New Guinea officials sent a notice to the camp warning the 600 individuals present that they have only two days for voluntary evacuation of the Manus camp. The notice stated that the refusal of these illegal migrants to leave the Manus camp will lead to the use of force by the relevant authorities to remove them. These refugees have been trapped in the mentioned camp for the past nine days and refuse to leave. Meanwhile, the United Nations has also warned about the situation of these refugees due to lack of access to electricity, water, and food. Although the Manus camp has been closed since October 31 and its water and electricity have been cut off, the refugees stationed there say they are afraid of potential violent confrontations with the island's locals and are unwilling to leave the detention center. The Papua New Guinea Immigration and Citizenship Service, in a two-page document sent to the camp and published by Reuters, wrote to the migrants that they may become seriously ill due to the lack of water and food, accumulation of garbage, and presence of sewage. For this reason, the refugees were asked to leave the camp as soon as possible and warned that if they resist leaving voluntarily, they will face force. According to the report, the male refugees inside this asylum camp have Iranian, Afghan, Pakistani, Syrian, Burmese, and Sri Lankan nationalities. They told Reuters that they continue to resist the evacuation of the camp and that if their food supplies run out, they will drink rainwater. The report also states that nearly 100 of them have fallen ill. Behrouz Boochani, a Kurdish Iranian refugee and journalist present in this camp, confirmed the start of the dismantling operation on his Twitter page on Thursday. He wrote that the refugees look at the workers who have entered the camp to dismantle it with fear and are unwilling to leave the camp for another detention center. The refugees say the solution to this problem is not the use of force but sending them to a third country. The Australian government has designated the islands of Manus and Nauru for the detention of refugees who attempted to reach this country by boat. On Tuesday of this week, a court in Papua New Guinea rejected the requests of the refugees stationed in the Manus Island camp to restore electricity and water and send food to this camp. Salama Injia, a judge of the Supreme Court of Papua New Guinea, stated in his ruling that the reasons provided by the refugees for not leaving the camp are not convincing. He noted that although the cutting of some services in this camp may have violated some provisions of the constitution, the cause of this is the refugees themselves who refuse to leave the detention center. Meanwhile, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees had previously described the current situation in the Manus camp as 'increasingly tense and uncertain' and reported that accommodations for this number of refugees outside the detention center are insufficient. Australia’s strict policies towards refugees attempting to reach this land by boat have faced severe criticism from the UN and human rights groups.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →