Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Parliament Delegates Decision on Interpretation of Election Law to the Expediency Council

Jan 28, 2026 January 28, 2026 4 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

The Iranian Parliament has sent a resolution to the Expediency Council asserting that the Guardian Council cannot disqualify elected candidates after the elections have been validated. This decision follows the controversial disqualification of Minou Khalighi, raising significant questions about electoral integrity and the powers of the Guardian Council. The ongoing conflict between the Parliament and the Guardian Council highlights tensions within Iran's political system.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The Parliament's challenge to the Guardian Council's authority over candidate disqualifications underscores deep political divisions in Iran.

👥 Key Players

Islamic Consultative Assembly (Parliament) MENTIONED
Legislative body of Iran
"They create laws and resolutions that impact governance and political processes in Iran."
Guardian Council MENTIONED
Body overseeing elections and candidate qualifications
"They hold significant power in determining who can run for office, influencing the political landscape."
Expediency Council MENTIONED
Advisory body that resolves disputes between Parliament and Guardian Council
"Their decisions can shape the interpretation of laws and the balance of power in Iranian governance."
Minou Khalighi MENTIONED
Disqualified parliamentary candidate
"Her case highlights the contentious issue of candidate disqualification in Iran."

📰 What Happened

The Iranian Parliament has sent a resolution to the Expediency Council asserting that the Guardian Council cannot disqualify candidates after elections have been validated. This follows the controversial disqualification of Minou Khalighi, raising questions about electoral integrity.

  • The Parliament voted 137 to 30 to send the resolution to the Expediency Council.
  • The Guardian Council has previously rejected similar interpretations from the Parliament.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: This decision reflects ongoing tensions between different branches of government and raises concerns about electoral integrity.
🌍 Regional: The outcome could influence political stability in Iran, which is a key player in the Middle East.
🌐 International: Western observers may view this as a sign of the internal political struggles within Iran, impacting diplomatic relations.

📚 Background

The Guardian Council has significant power over elections in Iran, often disqualifying candidates, which leads to public discontent and protests. The ongoing struggle between the Parliament and the Guardian Council reflects broader issues of governance and democracy in the country.

Iranian electoral system Political disqualification in Iran
📡 Source: STATE MEDIA
📊 Confidence: 70%
The information is sourced from state-affiliated news agencies, which may present a government-friendly perspective.

On Sunday, March 13, members of the Islamic Consultative Assembly reiterated their previous resolution regarding the impossibility of disqualifying candidates for parliamentary elections after the Guardian Council's final opinion, and this resolution was sent to the Expediency Council. According to the House of Representatives news agency, during the public session on Sunday, representatives insisted on their previous opinion while reviewing the interpretation of Clause 4 of Article 52 of the Election Law, which was returned by the Guardian Council, and with 137 votes in favor, 30 against, and 8 abstentions out of a total of 228 representatives present, it was referred to the Expediency Council. This interpretation was raised in response to the disqualification of Minou Khalighi, a candidate elected from Isfahan to the parliament, whose qualification was rejected by the Guardian Council after the elections, preventing her from entering the 10th parliament. The interpretation asked: "Can the Guardian Council disqualify the elected candidate after announcing the validity of the elections in the relevant constituency and thus invalidate their votes?" In response, the members of the Islamic Consultative Assembly approved: "No, after the final and definitive opinion of the Guardian Council within the 20-day period... this council cannot make another opinion regarding the qualification of that candidate or elected individual, and if new documents regarding them have reached the council, these documents will be reviewed according to Article 30 of the Internal Regulations of the Islamic Consultative Assembly during the examination of the credentials of the elected individuals." Previously, the parliament had voted positively on this interpretation on October 17. However, the Guardian Council deemed this interpretation contrary to Article 99 of the Constitution and stated that regardless of the mismatch between the question and the answer of the interpretation, the previous objections of this council still stand and are contrary to Article 99 of the Constitution and its interpretative theory. Nevertheless, on January 30, the parliament again approved an interpretation, deeming the disqualification of those elected to the parliament after the announcement of the validity of elections by the Guardian Council as illegal. According to ISNA news agency, members of the parliament stated in this decision that the Guardian Council cannot make another opinion regarding the qualification of a candidate or elected member of parliament. They also stated that if new documents regarding a candidate's qualification have reached the Guardian Council, these documents must be reviewed during the examination of the credentials of the elected individuals. Subsequently, Ali Motahari, the Deputy Speaker of the Parliament, on February 1, requested that the parliament's resolution regarding the prohibition of disqualifying elected individuals after the elections be sent to the Expediency Council, and if the council agrees with this resolution, Minou Khalighi, the third elected from Isfahan, will enter the parliament. Mr. Motahari told ISNA that the parliament's insistence on its resolution, despite being rejected twice by the Guardian Council, means that this resolution must be sent to the Expediency Council for a final ruling. In the meantime, Abbasali Kadkhodai, the spokesperson for the Guardian Council, stated on the 7th that this council once again considered the parliament's interpretation of an electoral clause as "flawed" and rejected it. The issue of "supervisory oversight" and the performance of the Guardian Council in reviewing the qualifications of candidates in all parliamentary and presidential elections has caused significant protests, yet this council continues to disqualify many candidates in all election periods. According to Article 99 of the Constitution, the Guardian Council is responsible for overseeing all elections except for council elections, and based on the interpretation provided by this council of this article, this oversight is "supervisory and includes all executive stages of elections, including the approval and disqualification of candidates."

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →