Condoleezza Rice, the US National Security Advisor, stated that the United States does not rule out the possibility of engaging in covert operations to disrupt the nuclear program of the Islamic Republic of Iran. In a television interview on Sunday, Ms. Rice said that America would use what she referred to as 'many ways' to stop what it considers Iran's efforts to acquire nuclear weapons. When asked if these 'many ways' include covert operations, she stated that President Bush would 'of course' consider all available options. This question arose in connection with a recent report by The New York Times. The New York Times reported on Sunday that US officials want to carry out certain covert operations to disrupt or delay what has been described as Iran's attempts to produce a nuclear bomb. Iranian officials claim that Iran's nuclear program is solely for peaceful purposes.
Possibility of US Covert Operations to Disrupt Iran's Nuclear Program
US National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice indicated the possibility of covert operations to disrupt Iran's nuclear ambitions. This statement follows a report suggesting that US officials are considering specific secret actions to counter Iran's nuclear program. The situation is significant as it highlights ongoing tensions between the US and Iran regarding nuclear capabilities.
👥 Key Players
📰 What Happened
US National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice indicated that the US may consider covert operations to disrupt Iran's nuclear program. This follows a report suggesting that US officials are exploring secret actions to counter Iran's nuclear ambitions.
- Condoleezza Rice mentioned that President Bush would consider all options to stop Iran's nuclear efforts.
- Iran claims its nuclear program is intended solely for peaceful purposes.
💡 Why It Matters
📚 Background
The US and Iran have a long-standing conflict over Iran's nuclear program, with the US accusing Iran of seeking nuclear weapons while Iran insists its program is for peaceful purposes.
🏷️ Entities Mentioned
Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →
Translation confidence: 85%