Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Reactions to President Bush's Message About Iran in the U.S. Congress - 2002-07-17

Feb 12, 2026 February 12, 2026 3 min read 📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway

In the U.S. Congress, both Republicans and Democrats express support for President Bush's stance on Iran, emphasizing the distinction between the Iranian people and their government. Representatives Gutknecht and Sherman highlight the need for democracy in Iran and the dangers posed by the current regime. This reflects a bipartisan consensus on U.S. policy towards Iran amid concerns over terrorism and weapons of mass destruction.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The U.S. Congress shows a unified front in supporting the Iranian people against their government, reflecting a significant aspect of U.S. foreign policy.

👥 Key Players

George W. Bush MENTIONED
President of the United States
"His administration's foreign policy significantly impacts U.S.-Iran relations and regional stability."
Gil Gutknecht MENTIONED
Republican Representative from Minnesota
"He represents a bipartisan congressional support for U.S. policy towards Iran and emphasizes the distinction between the Iranian people and their government."
Brad Sherman MENTIONED
Democratic Representative from California
"He advocates for democracy in Iran and expresses concerns about the Iranian regime's potential for developing weapons of mass destruction."

📰 What Happened

In a congressional session, both Republican and Democratic representatives expressed support for President Bush's message regarding Iran, highlighting the need to distinguish between the Iranian people and their government. They emphasized the importance of democracy in Iran and the dangers posed by the current regime.

  • President Bush referred to Iran as part of the 'Axis of Evil', but clarified his support for the Iranian people seeking reform.
  • Congressional representatives discussed the implications of Iranian government actions, particularly concerning terrorism and weapons of mass destruction.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: This bipartisan support from U.S. lawmakers may encourage reformist movements within Iran, as it signals international backing for the Iranian populace.
🌍 Regional: The U.S. stance on Iran affects regional dynamics, particularly in relation to U.S. allies and adversaries in the Middle East.
🌐 International: The U.S. policy towards Iran has implications for global security, especially concerning terrorism and nuclear proliferation.

📚 Background

In the early 2000s, the U.S. was increasingly concerned about Iran's nuclear ambitions and its support for terrorist organizations, leading to a focus on promoting democracy in the region.

U.S.-Iran relations Middle Eastern geopolitics
📡 Source: NEUTRAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The article reports on congressional reactions and is based on statements made by public officials, providing a factual account of the event.

Reactions to President Bush's Message About Iran in the U.S. Congress - 2002-07-17. Both Republicans and Democrats in the U.S. Congress support President Bush's views on Iran. More details come from a report prepared by Mahtab Farid, a reporter for the Persian section of Voice of America. Gil Gutknecht, a Republican representative from Minnesota, considers President Bush's statement the clearest instance of separating the Iranian people from the ruling regime in Iran. He states that when President Bush used the famous term 'Axis of Evil' regarding Iran, some thought he was referring to the Iranian people. President Bush has clearly distinguished between the people who seek reform and true democracy in Iran and the leaders, particularly some clerics and ayatollahs, who obstruct any reforms desired by the people. The Republican representative from Minnesota said we have made it clear from the beginning that the Iranian government supports terrorism and we cannot accept such actions. Mr. Gutknecht stated: Once again, the President made it clear that we are with the Iranian people and cannot be with governments that support terrorism. When I asked Mr. Gutknecht if he thinks the U.S. government will intervene in Iran in some way, for example, by supporting the student movement or other movements, he said he was not sure if we would intervene directly. However, he is confident that the President's statement contained a clear message. That we have taken the right position and are with them, and I believe this will ultimately help their efforts to achieve reforms in Iran. The Minnesota representative expressed hope to convey his message to the Iranian people in a small sentence in Persian. Brad Sherman, a Democratic representative from California, also emphasized the clear distinction between the Iranian people and their rulers in President Bush's recent statement about Iran. Mr. Sherman said we demand nothing less for the Iranian people than what we want for ourselves, including that we not only want leaders who are freely elected but also want elected leaders who can genuinely implement the expected powers and authorities of the government. Mr. Sherman expressed concern about the idea of weapons of mass destruction being produced by extremist and unelected elements controlling the Iranian government. He stated that the extension of the investment sanctions law in Iran and Libya was also aimed at limiting the production of weapons of mass destruction, and further steps will be taken through the World Bank, which intends to provide Iran with loans worth $755 million. Mr. Sherman said: I want to see democracy in Iran. I want to see a government in Iran that represents the honor and dignity of the Iranian people. When this happens, I will also loudly support economic relations with Iran and World Bank loans for Iran. Mr. Sherman rejected any intervention similar to the U.S. intervention in Afghanistan regarding Iran, stating that Iran is different from Afghanistan or Iraq and that we will support democratic elements in Iran.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →