Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی ✈️ Telegram EN فا
❓ Unknown

Reformist Activists Address Officials: Focusing on Foreign Factors is an Insult to Our Society

Jan 26, 2026 January 26, 2026 4 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

Sixteen reformist activists criticized Iranian officials for blaming foreign interference in recent protests, calling it an insult to the people. They emphasized the need to address the internal roots of dissatisfaction and proposed political reforms as essential for resolving economic issues. The statement reflects ongoing tensions between reformist voices and the ruling establishment amidst widespread protests.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: Reformist activists are pushing back against government narratives, calling for internal reforms to address the root causes of public dissatisfaction.

👥 Key Players

Reformist Activists MENTIONED
Political activists and critics of the current regime
"They represent a faction within Iran advocating for political reforms and addressing internal issues rather than attributing problems to external factors."
Islamic Republic Officials MENTIONED
Government representatives including President Hassan Rouhani and security officials
"They control the state narrative and response to protests, often blaming foreign interference to deflect criticism of their governance."
U.S. Government MENTIONED
Foreign government expressing support for Iranian protests
"Their involvement influences international perceptions and can exacerbate tensions between Iran and the West."
Israeli Government MENTIONED
Foreign government accused of interference by Iranian officials
"Their denial of involvement highlights the contentious relationship between Iran and Israel."

📰 What Happened

Sixteen reformist activists criticized Iranian officials for blaming foreign interference in recent protests, asserting that this view disrespects the Iranian people's grievances. They called for addressing internal issues and implementing political reforms to resolve dissatisfaction.

  • The activists condemned the focus on foreign interference as an insult to the Iranian populace.
  • They emphasized that economic problems require political reforms and better public oversight.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: This statement highlights the growing divide between reformist activists and the government, indicating potential for increased civil unrest if grievances are not addressed.
🌍 Regional: The situation in Iran can influence regional stability, particularly in relation to U.S.-Iran tensions and the role of neighboring countries.
🌐 International: International stakeholders, especially the U.S., are watching Iran's internal dynamics closely, as they can affect foreign policy and sanctions.

📚 Background

Iran has a history of protests driven by economic issues and political repression, with reformist factions advocating for change within the system.

Iranian protests Political reform in Iran
📡 Source: NEUTRAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The article presents a statement from reformist activists, reflecting their perspective without overt bias, but should be viewed in the context of ongoing political tensions.

Sixteen reformist political activists have deemed the claims of Islamic Republic officials regarding 'foreign interference' in recent protests as an 'insult' to the people, emphasizing that 'focusing on foreign factors leads to neglect or disregard of the roots of protests and dissatisfaction and their remedies.' In a statement published on the 'Emtidad' website, it is highlighted that 'although there is no doubt that the enemies of the country are always seeking to exploit such events and take a supportive stance, it must be noted that foreign interference at any level is not possible without internal grounds.' According to the authors of this statement, 'focusing on foreign factors, in addition to insulting our society, leads to neglect or disregard of the roots of protests and dissatisfaction and their remedies. It is our duty to address the factors that create such crises at all levels and domains.' These reformist figures have also strongly condemned what they termed 'U.S. interference, especially by its President' in Iran's affairs. Signatories of this statement include Mohsen Armin, Mohsen Aminzadeh, Mostafa Tajzadeh, Reza Tehrani, Hamid Jalaipour, Saeed Hajarian, Mohammad Reza Khatami, Hadi Khaniki, Abdollah Ramazanzadeh, Mohsen Safaei Farahani, Abbas Abdi, Feyzollah Arab-Sorkhi, Ali-Reza Alavitabar, Azar Mansouri, Mohsen Mir-Damadi, and Mohammad Naeimi-Pour. President Hassan Rouhani, Ali Shamkhani, Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, and other officials of the Islamic Republic have accused Israel, the U.S., and Saudi Arabia of instigating the recent protests in Iran. Israel has denied interference in Iran's protests, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu describing Rouhani's accusations as 'lies and ridiculous.' Donald Trump and several officials from his administration and U.S. lawmakers have expressed support for peaceful protests in Iran. Meanwhile, a UN Security Council meeting regarding unrest and the suppression of protesters in Iran was held on Friday at the request of the U.S. The sixteen reformist political activists emphasized in their statement that despite people's participation in elections, 'unfortunately, a measured and timely response to the civil behavior of the people has not been provided, and there have been repeated reactions that have caused parts of society to feel humiliated and hopeless.' According to these reformist activists, although the economic aspect of the protests is more general, the root of solving economic problems lies in 'political reforms, expanding and strengthening public oversight, making official oversight bodies more efficient and independent, and civil and media freedoms,' and 'without accepting such reforms, fundamental changes and solving economic issues and reducing dissatisfaction cannot be achieved.' They stated that 'the lack of understanding and agreement on fundamental issues of the country and the weakness of political and social cohesion have intensified political and social fractures and duality in the management of the country.' In recent days, close associates of the Supreme Leader have expressed that the main roots of the recent protests are inflation and economic issues, but foreign countries and opposition groups outside the Islamic Republic have 'exploited' them and 'diverted' the course of protests. The sixteen reformist activists also attributed the 'continuation of violent' recent protests to the 'lack or weakness of institutions for resolving social conflicts and the peaceful expression of protests and recognizing the legal right to protest.' The authors of this statement emphasized that 'violence and its promotion is merely a lose-lose game that opens the way for political blockage and hinders the effectiveness of rightful protests.' The statement also declared that 'naturally, combating violence is only permissible within the framework of the law and with public persuasion.' Article 27 of the Islamic Republic of Iran's Constitution states: 'Formation of gatherings and marches, without carrying weapons, is free, provided that it does not disrupt the principles of Islam.' However, Iranian laws provide complex conditions for issuing permits for gatherings or marches, and the Ministry of Interior has only approved a few requests in this regard in recent years. Groups requesting to hold gatherings or marches must also inform the Ministry of Interior of the 'complete specifications of executive and security officials' in addition to the subject and time of the march. Nevertheless, the Ministry of Interior has rarely issued permits for marches and gatherings in recent years, including rejecting requests from Mir-Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karroubi, leaders of the 2009 presidential election protests and their supporting parties, to hold gatherings.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →