Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
🔴 Breaking ❓ Unknown

Response of Elahe Mohammadi's Husband to Judiciary Media Documentary; 'They Have Issued the Final Ruling Instead of the Appeals Judge'

May 13, 2026 May 13, 2026 3 min read 📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway

Saeed Parsaee, husband of detained journalist Elahe Mohammadi, criticized a documentary aired by the Judiciary's media, claiming it lacked credible evidence and undermined the appeals process. The documentary was released after a court sentenced Mohammadi and Niloufar Hamedi to a total of 25 years in prison for their journalistic activities during protests. This situation highlights ongoing concerns about press freedom and judicial fairness in Iran.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The case underscores the Iranian regime's crackdown on dissent.

👥 Key Players

Saeed Parsaee (سعید پارسایی) QUOTED
Husband of Elahe Mohammadi
"'How can we expect the appeals court to handle the case with impartiality?'"
Elahe Mohammadi (الهه محمدی) TARGET
Detained journalist
"Elahe Mohammadi was sentenced to 6 years in prison"
Niloufar Hamedi (نیلوفر حامدی) TARGET
Detained journalist
"Niloufar Hamedi was sentenced to 13 years in prison"
Mizan News Agency ACTOR
Media outlet affiliated with the Judiciary
"documentary aired by the Mizan News Agency"
International Federation of Journalists QUOTED
Advocacy group
"condemned the prison sentences for Niloufar Hamedi and Elahe Mohammadi"
Amnesty International QUOTED
Human rights organization
"called for the immediate release of imprisoned journalists"

⚡ Actions

Tehran Revolutionary Court INDICT Elahe Mohammadi, Niloufar Hamedi
"sentencing them to a total of 25 years in prison, of which 13 years is 'enforceable'"
Confidence: 90%
Mizan News Agency BROADCAST Elahe Mohammadi, Niloufar Hamedi
"documentary aired by the Mizan News Agency on his account on the 'X' network"
Confidence: 90%
state media ACCUSE Elahe Mohammadi, Niloufar Hamedi
"individuals in state media have accused them of espionage"
Confidence: 80%

📰 What Happened

Saeed Parsaee criticized a documentary on his wife Elahe Mohammadi's case, claiming bias and lack of evidence.

  • Tehran Revolutionary Court indict Elahe Mohammadi, Niloufar Hamedi
  • Mizan News Agency broadcast Elahe Mohammadi, Niloufar Hamedi
  • state media accuse Elahe Mohammadi, Niloufar Hamedi

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Because it highlights the suppression of press freedom and judicial fairness.
🌍 Regional: Because it reflects ongoing human rights abuses in Iran.
🌐 International: Because it raises concerns over Iran's treatment of journalists.

📚 Background

The case underscores the Iranian regime's crackdown on dissent.

📝 Key Evidence

"not a single admissible document was presented in this film"
→ questioning the validity of the documentary
"'If there was an obligation for the trial to be private, what justification do they have for broadcasting the matters discussed in the court sessions unilaterally?'"
→ highlighting the unfairness of the trial process
📡 Source: STATE MEDIA
📊 Confidence: 70%
The source is affiliated with the Iranian government, potentially affecting objectivity.

Saeed Parsaee, the husband of Elahe Mohammadi, a detained journalist from the Ham-Mihan newspaper, has expressed his objections to a documentary aired by the Mizan News Agency on his account on the 'X' network, stating that not a single admissible document was presented in this film. This documentary, titled 'Informer', was broadcast by Mizan, a media outlet affiliated with the Judiciary of the Islamic Republic, against detained journalists Niloufar Hamedi and Elahe Mohammadi. The documentary was aired immediately after Branch 15 of the Tehran Revolutionary Court issued the verdict in the case of these two journalists, sentencing them to a total of 25 years in prison, of which 13 years is 'enforceable'. Mr. Parsaee stated that the Judiciary's media, by airing this documentary, not only questioned the principles of handling judicial cases and the two-stage verdict issuance system in the Judiciary but also attempted to convey to the public that the ruling was '100% correct' and 'final'. He further stated, 'How can we expect the appeals court to handle the case with impartiality?' Elahe Mohammadi's husband mentioned that the documentary used 'private content' from the mobile phones of Elahe Mohammadi and Niloufar Hamedi, as well as audio files and their virtual conversations, and that they were published 'in a fragmented and biased manner'. Saeed Parsaee noted that since the defenses of Elahe Mohammadi and Niloufar Hamedi and their lawyers were not reflected in this documentary, they are obliged under press law to publish the responses sent to them. He also rejected the connection of Elahe Mohammadi and Niloufar Hamedi with the organization 'Alliance for Iran', which was mentioned in the documentary, emphasizing that they have repeatedly denied collaborating with this organization in their defenses, and the documentary did not provide any evidence of this connection. Elahe Mohammadi's husband stated that despite the insistence of the families, the trial of these two journalists was held in private. He added, 'If there was an obligation for the trial to be private, what justification do they have for broadcasting the matters discussed in the court sessions unilaterally?' Saeed Parsaee mentioned that since the beginning of the detention of Ms. Mohammadi and Hamedi, individuals in state media have accused them of espionage, and he stated that they will file complaints against all these individuals. Elahe Mohammadi and Niloufar Hamedi were arrested during last year's nationwide protests for covering the news of the death of Mahsa Amini in custody of the 'Guidance Patrol' and were accused of 'collaborating with an enemy state', an accusation that has always been denied by both of them and their lawyers. Elahe Mohammadi was sentenced to 6 years in prison for 'collaborating with the enemy state of America', 5 years for 'gathering and colluding to commit a crime against national security', and 1 year for 'propaganda against the Islamic Republic of Iran'. The International Federation of Journalists condemned the prison sentences for Niloufar Hamedi and Elahe Mohammadi. Amnesty International called for the immediate release of imprisoned journalists Niloufar Hamedi and Elahe Mohammadi. The UN Special Rapporteur urged the Islamic Republic to stop the widespread harassment of human rights defenders and journalists. The announced sentences for the case are: Niloufar Hamedi; 13 years in prison, 7 years of which are enforceable | Elahe Mohammadi; 12 years in prison, 6 years of which are enforceable.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →