Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Response to Hashemi's Statements on the 2013 Elections: 'The Guardian Council's Opinion is Independent'

Jan 29, 2026 January 29, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

The spokesman for the Guardian Council, Abbasali Kadkhodai, rejected Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani's claims about the influence of a former intelligence minister in his disqualification during the 2013 elections, asserting the council's independence while acknowledging the collection of expert opinions. This controversy highlights ongoing tensions regarding electoral integrity and the influence of security agencies in Iranian politics.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The dispute over Rafsanjani's disqualification highlights ongoing concerns about the influence of security agencies in Iranian elections.

👥 Key Players

Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani MENTIONED
Former President of Iran and influential political figure
"A key figure in Iranian politics with a significant legacy, Rafsanjani's statements can influence public opinion and political discourse."
Abbasali Kadkhodai MENTIONED
Spokesman for the Guardian Council
"As a spokesperson for the body responsible for overseeing elections, his statements reflect the council's stance and influence on electoral integrity."
Heydar Moslehi MENTIONED
Former Minister of Intelligence
"His actions and influence during the 2013 elections highlight the intersection of security and politics in Iran."

📰 What Happened

The spokesman for the Guardian Council dismissed Rafsanjani's claims about external influence in his disqualification from the 2013 elections, asserting the council's independence while acknowledging that expert opinions are consulted. This exchange underscores ongoing tensions regarding the integrity of Iran's electoral processes.

  • Rafsanjani was disqualified from the 2013 presidential elections, allegedly due to pressure from security officials.
  • Kadkhodai confirmed that the Guardian Council's decisions are independent, despite acknowledging the input of expert opinions.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: This controversy raises questions about the fairness and transparency of Iran's electoral processes, which can affect public trust in the government.
🌍 Regional: The implications of electoral integrity in Iran can influence regional stability and relations with neighboring countries.
🌐 International: International observers may view this situation as indicative of broader issues regarding democracy and governance in Iran, impacting diplomatic relations.

📚 Background

The Guardian Council is responsible for vetting candidates in Iranian elections, and its decisions are often scrutinized for political motivations. Rafsanjani's disqualification in 2013 is a notable example of alleged political maneuvering.

Iranian electoral politics Role of the Guardian Council
📡 Source: STATE MEDIA
📊 Confidence: 70%
Mizan is the official news agency of the Iranian judiciary, which may present information in a manner that aligns with state perspectives.

The spokesman for the Guardian Council commented on recent remarks by Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani regarding the role of the former Minister of Intelligence in his disqualification by the council, stating that the Guardian Council takes expert opinions from various sectors but its opinion is 'independent.' Abbasali Kadkhodai, the spokesman, rejected Hashemi's statements in an interview with Mizan, the official news agency of the judiciary, adding that 'the opinion of the Guardian Council is an independent opinion and solely the opinion of its members.' According to Kadkhodai, despite the 'independence of opinion' of the Guardian Council, 'expert opinions are taken from various sectors.' The spokesman also noted that 'this matter is not a hidden issue... the situation is not as it has been presented.' However, Kadkhodai did not explain how the 'situation' occurred; previously, during the 2013 elections, he had implicitly confirmed Hashemi's claims regarding the involvement of security officials in his disqualification. The head of the Expediency Discernment Council explained that Heydar Moslehi, the former Minister of Intelligence, played a direct role in his disqualification by the Guardian Council in the 2013 presidential elections. He stated, 'The Minister of Intelligence at the time [Heydar Moslehi] went to the Guardian Council during the qualification review and said that with the popularity that is increasing day by day, he [Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani] would come with an unprecedented vote and would unravel all our ten-year plans.' Hashemi entered the race for the presidential elections at the last moments of registration but was ultimately disqualified by the Guardian Council due to what was cited as 'old age.' At that time, Hashemi had addressed how he was disqualified by the Guardian Council and mentioned the role of a senior security official in his disqualification. He stated that 'a senior security official, contrary to custom and law, personally attended the qualification review meeting at the Guardian Council, which was initially protested by some members of the Guardian Council, and ultimately told the members that Hashemi's presence in the elections could lead to a decisive victory with a high vote from the people, which is not compatible with their ways, and thus convinced the council to vote against my qualification under the pretext of my physical condition.' A day later, Abbasali Kadkhodai, in his capacity as spokesman for the Guardian Council, implicitly confirmed the presence of security officials in the council during its decision-making process regarding Hashemi Rafsanjani's qualification review. Heydar Moslehi, the Minister of Intelligence under Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, had accused Hashemi of involvement in the '2009 sedition' on the eve of the 2013 presidential elections and amid reports of Hashemi Rafsanjani's potential candidacy.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →