Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
🔴 Breaking ❓ Unknown

Reuters: Many U.S. States Plan to Continue Their Sanctions Against Iran

Jul 4, 2026 July 4, 2026 2 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

Many U.S. states plan to continue their sanctions against Iran despite potential federal agreements, complicating U.S.-Iran relations. Over 20 states have punitive laws against companies that engage with Iran, and some states have indicated they will only lift sanctions if Iran changes its behavior. This situation highlights the fragmented approach to U.S. foreign policy on Iran.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The persistence of state-level sanctions against Iran undermines potential federal agreements.

👥 Key Players

Barack Obama QUOTED
Former U.S. President
"Barack Obama... warned Congress about imposing new sanctions against Iran."
Dan Getz QUOTED
Florida State Senator
"Senator Getz told Reuters: 'They [the Iranian government] need to show a significant change in behavior.'"
Kansas ACTOR
U.S. State
"Even the states of Kansas and Mississippi have considered new sanctions against Iran."
Mississippi ACTOR
U.S. State
"Even the states of Kansas and Mississippi have considered new sanctions against Iran."
California ACTOR
U.S. State
"California, Texas, Illinois, Ohio, Indiana, Georgia, Arizona, Alaska, New York, Michigan, and Florida... prevent companies engaged in trade with Iran from dealing with their public sectors."
Florida ACTOR
U.S. State
"Senator Getz told Reuters: 'They [the Iranian government] need to show a significant change in behavior.'"

⚡ Actions

U.S. states SANCTION Iran
"Many U.S. states are likely to maintain their separate sanctions against Tehran."
Confidence: 90%
Iran and the 1+5 group NEGOTIATE nuclear agreement
"Iran and the 1+5 group have set a deadline to reach a comprehensive nuclear agreement by July 9."
Confidence: 90%
New York and Oregon officials REVIEW sanctions against Iran
"Officials from some of these states... have stated that they will review their policies in the event of a nuclear agreement."
Confidence: 70%

📰 What Happened

Many U.S. states plan to continue sanctions against Iran despite potential nuclear agreement.

  • U.S. states sanction Iran
  • Iran and the 1+5 group negotiate nuclear agreement
  • New York and Oregon officials review sanctions against Iran

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Because the continuation of sanctions complicates Iran's economic recovery and diplomatic efforts.
🌍 Regional: Because it affects regional stability and Iran's relations with neighboring countries.
🌐 International: Because it challenges U.S. foreign policy and negotiations with Iran over nuclear issues.

📚 Background

The persistence of state-level sanctions against Iran undermines potential federal agreements.

📝 Key Evidence

"Many U.S. states are likely to maintain their separate sanctions against Tehran."
→ This proves the ongoing sanctions against Iran by multiple U.S. states.
"They [the Iranian government] need to show a significant change in behavior."
→ This indicates the conditions under which states may reconsider their sanctions.
📡 Source: INTERNATIONAL
📊 Confidence: 90%
Reuters is generally considered a reliable news source.

Reuters reported that as Iran and the U.S. approach a nuclear agreement, many U.S. states are likely to maintain their separate sanctions against Tehran, complicating relations between the two countries. This report was published on Monday, April 24, and states that currently more than 20 U.S. states have punitive laws against companies that ignore sanctions against Iran. These punitive laws can prevent such companies from doing business with pension funds worth billions of dollars. More than half of these states will only end their sanctions against Iran if, according to them, Iran ceases its support for terrorism or if all federal sanctions against Iran are lifted. Even the states of Kansas and Mississippi have considered new sanctions against Iran. Meanwhile, Barack Obama, the U.S. President, had previously warned Congress about imposing new sanctions against Iran amid nuclear negotiations, but for instance, Florida State Senator Dan Getz emphasizes that the investment sanctions of this state have nothing to do with Obama's negotiations with Iran. Senator Getz told Reuters: 'They [the Iranian government] need to show a significant change in behavior. We do not necessarily follow the views of President Obama or any other president regarding Iran.' California, Texas, Illinois, Ohio, Indiana, Georgia, Arizona, Alaska, New York, Michigan, and Florida are among the states that, through punitive laws, prevent companies engaged in trade with Iran from dealing with their public sectors. Reuters writes that senators from more than 10 states contacted by the news agency emphasized that even if the U.S. government reaches an agreement with Iran, these states do not intend to change their policies regarding Iran, including Florida, Michigan, and Georgia. However, officials from some of these states, such as New York and Oregon, have stated that they will review their policies in the event of a nuclear agreement and changes in federal laws. Iran and the 1+5 group have set a deadline to reach a comprehensive nuclear agreement by July 9. In this context, Iranian officials have warned that reaching an agreement is contingent upon the lifting of all sanctions against Iran from the day the agreement is implemented.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →