Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی ✈️ Telegram EN فا
❓ Unknown

Reuters: Saudi Arabia Threatens the U.S. to Avoid Dollar in Oil Transactions

Jan 24, 2026 January 24, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

Saudi Arabia has threatened to avoid using the dollar in oil transactions if the U.S. Congress passes the NOPEC bill aimed at curbing OPEC's monopoly. This threat could significantly affect U.S. influence in global trade and the dollar's dominance in oil transactions. The situation highlights tensions between the U.S. and Saudi Arabia amid ongoing discussions on oil production cuts.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: Saudi Arabia's threat to abandon the dollar in oil transactions could have significant global economic repercussions.

👥 Key Players

Saudi Arabia MENTIONED
Largest oil exporter and key OPEC member
"Saudi Arabia's decisions can significantly impact global oil markets and economic policies."
United States MENTIONED
Global economic and political power
"The U.S. dollar is the dominant currency in global oil transactions, giving the U.S. significant economic leverage."
Donald Trump MENTIONED
U.S. President at the time
"His administration's policies and stance on OPEC influence U.S.-Saudi relations and global oil dynamics."

📰 What Happened

Saudi Arabia has threatened to stop using the U.S. dollar for oil transactions if the U.S. passes the NOPEC bill, which targets OPEC's market practices. This move could undermine the dollar's dominance in global oil markets.

  • The NOPEC bill aims to curb OPEC's monopolistic practices.
  • Saudi Arabia produces 10% of the world's oil and is the largest oil exporter.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Iran, under U.S. sanctions, could benefit from any weakening of the dollar's dominance, potentially easing its own economic pressures.
🌍 Regional: Regional power dynamics could shift if Saudi Arabia moves away from the dollar, impacting trade and economic alliances.
🌐 International: A shift away from the dollar in oil transactions could weaken U.S. economic influence and encourage other countries to diversify currency usage.

📚 Background

The NOPEC bill has been proposed multiple times since 2000 but has never been enacted due to potential economic repercussions. Saudi Arabia's economic ties with the U.S. include significant investments and financial holdings.

OPEC's role in global oil markets U.S. sanctions and their global impact
📡 Source: INTERNATIONAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
Reuters is a reputable international news agency known for its broad coverage and generally reliable reporting.

On Friday, April 5, Reuters reported that Saudi Arabia threatened the U.S. to avoid using the dollar in oil transactions if the "NOPEC" bill is approved and enacted. The NOPEC bill, aimed at combating monopolistic practices in the oil market by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), has been proposed in the U.S. Congress since 2000, but U.S. presidents have previously stated they would veto it if Congress passed it to prevent it from becoming law. However, current U.S. President Donald Trump has repeatedly accused OPEC of "monopolistic" behavior in the oil market and has even threatened to take action against it. Reuters reported on Friday, citing three unnamed sources, that "Saudi Arabia's threat to avoid the dollar in oil transactions" was raised during meetings between senior energy officials from both countries in recent months and was even discussed at the OPEC summit. Saudi Arabia's refusal to use the dollar could impact U.S. influence in global trade, and the U.S. could lose the necessary leverage to impose sanctions. Currently, oil transactions in global markets are conducted in dollars, and Saudi Arabia, producing 10% of the world's oil, is the largest oil exporter. Depending on its price, oil accounts for 2-3% of the global economy, and with the current price of $70 per barrel, the value of global oil production reaches $2.5 trillion annually, with 60% of it traded among countries almost entirely in dollars. On the other hand, this action by Saudi Arabia could intensify the desire of Russia, China, and the European Union to reduce dollar influence and diversify international currencies for trade transactions. Russia, which has been under U.S. sanctions, has previously decided to sell oil in euros and Chinese yuan, but only a small portion of Russian oil is sold in these currencies. Iran and Venezuela, also facing U.S. sanctions, sell their oil using non-dollar currencies, but the volume of transactions is less than what would impact dollar dominance in global markets, while Saudi Arabia has an annual oil production worth $356 billion. Additionally, in the two major energy exchanges in the world (ICE and CME), transactions worth $5 trillion are conducted annually in U.S. dollars. The Saudi Ministry of Energy declined to respond to Reuters' questions, and the U.S. State Department stated it would not comment on a bill that has not yet become law. Reuters also reported that U.S. Energy Secretary Rick Perry indicated that the passage of NOPEC could have "unintended consequences." Qatar exited OPEC last December to avoid the repercussions of the NOPEC bill, yet two sources told Reuters that Saudi Arabia does not see a high likelihood of the NOPEC bill being passed. Saudi Arabia has also invested $1 trillion in the U.S. and saved $160 billion in U.S. banks and financial institutions. OPEC and allied countries led by Russia have decided to reduce their production by 1.2 million barrels in the first half of this year to raise oil prices. According to international statistics, including OPEC, Saudi Arabia has cut production twice as much as it committed to. Oil prices have increased by about 27% since the beginning of 2019, which has provoked U.S. complaints. Recently, some OPEC members announced the possibility of extending the oil production cut agreement for the second half of 2019.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →