Sergei Ivanov, the Russian Defense Minister, believes that when the United Nations weapons inspection team returns to Iraq, it will be able to quickly determine whether Iraq possesses weapons of mass destruction. Ivanov expressed this opinion on Thursday ahead of discussions scheduled in Washington with U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. Russia opposes any unilateral military action against Iraq and supports the resumption of inspections to alleviate concerns about prohibited weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. However, Donald Rumsfeld has repeatedly stated that inspections cannot be 100% reliable. No inspections of Iraq's weapons programs have taken place since 1998, and Rumsfeld claims that Baghdad has had four years to figure out how and where to hide its weapons.
Russia Welcomes Resumption of Inspections in Iraq - 2002-09-20
Russia's Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov supports the return of UN weapons inspectors to Iraq, believing they can quickly assess Iraq's possession of weapons of mass destruction. This stance comes ahead of talks with U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who remains skeptical about the reliability of inspections. The situation is significant as it highlights the tensions between Russia and the U.S. regarding military actions in Iraq.
👥 Key Players
📰 What Happened
Russia's Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov expressed support for the return of UN weapons inspectors to Iraq, believing they could quickly assess Iraq's weapons capabilities. This statement was made ahead of discussions with U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who doubts the reliability of such inspections.
- No inspections of Iraq's weapons programs have occurred since 1998.
- Rumsfeld claims Iraq has had ample time to conceal its weapons.
💡 Why It Matters
📚 Background
The debate over Iraq's weapons of mass destruction was a major factor leading to the Iraq War in 2003, with inspections seen as a key mechanism for international oversight.
🏷️ Entities Mentioned
Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →
Translation confidence: 85%