Russian President Vladimir Putin stated that a US attack on Iraq without the approval of the United Nations would be a major mistake. He added that to prevent the 'unreasonable use of force,' Russia might consider using its veto power in the UN Security Council, although he does not currently see the necessity for such action. Meanwhile, the White House expressed hope that a resolution concerning the use of military force against Iraq would pass in the Security Council. Additionally, Putin defended the joint proposal from France, Russia, and Germany to strengthen UN inspections. However, British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw stated that until Baghdad cooperates adequately, no inspection team can truly determine whether Iraq has been disarmed or not.
Russian President: A US Attack on Iraq Without UN Approval Would Be a Major Mistake - 2003-02-12
Russian President Vladimir Putin warned against a US military attack on Iraq without UN approval, suggesting that Russia might use its veto power in the Security Council if necessary. The White House is optimistic about a resolution for military action, while British officials emphasize the need for Iraqi cooperation for inspections to be effective.
👥 Key Players
📰 What Happened
Russian President Vladimir Putin warned that a U.S. attack on Iraq without UN approval would be a major mistake. He suggested that Russia might use its veto power in the UN Security Council to prevent such action, while the U.S. remained optimistic about gaining approval for military force.
- Putin emphasized the importance of UN approval for military action.
- The U.S. and UK were pushing for military intervention based on Iraq's alleged non-compliance with disarmament.
💡 Why It Matters
📚 Background
In early 2003, tensions were high over Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction, leading to calls for military action by the U.S. and its allies. Russia and other nations were advocating for diplomatic solutions through the UN.
🏷️ Entities Mentioned
Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →
Translation confidence: 85%