Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
🔴 Breaking ❓ Unknown

Salahi Reiterates: JCPOA to Be Implemented by Mid-January

Jun 20, 2026 June 20, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

Ali Akbar Salehi, head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization, predicts the implementation of the JCPOA by mid-January, despite conditions set by Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi regarding military dimensions. The negotiations with the IAEA are reported to be positive, but there are concerns about potential obstacles that could halt the agreement's implementation.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The implementation of the JCPOA hinges on resolving military dimension concerns.

👥 Key Players

Ali Akbar Salehi (علی اکبر صالحی) QUOTED
Head of the Atomic Energy Organization
"'If the JCPOA is implemented by the end of this month or mid-January...'"
Abbas Araghchi (عباس عراقچی) QUOTED
Senior Coordinator for the Implementation of the Nuclear Agreement
"'if there were obstacles to closing the file on the possible military dimensions... the implementation of the JCPOA would be halted'"
Yukiya Amano QUOTED
Director-General of the IAEA
"'he would present his final report to the Board of Governors...'"
Mohammad Saidi QUOTED
Former Deputy of the Atomic Energy Organization
"'the cost of Iran's nuclear program to be less than two billion dollars...'"

⚡ Actions

Ali Akbar Salehi ANNOUNCE JCPOA
"Salehi said on Thursday, December 5, 'If the JCPOA is implemented by the end of this month or mid-January...'"
Confidence: 90%
Abbas Araghchi WARN 5+1 group
"'if there were obstacles to closing the file on the possible military dimensions... the implementation of the JCPOA would be halted'"
Confidence: 90%
Iranian experts NEGOTIATE IAEA officials
"'the negotiations between Araghchi and Iranian experts with agency officials have been positive'"
Confidence: 80%

📰 What Happened

Iran's officials discuss JCPOA implementation contingent on resolving military nuclear program issues.

  • Ali Akbar Salehi announce JCPOA
  • Abbas Araghchi warn 5+1 group
  • Iranian experts negotiate IAEA officials

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Because successful implementation of the JCPOA could ease sanctions and improve economic conditions.
🌍 Regional: Because it may stabilize regional tensions related to Iran's nuclear capabilities.
🌐 International: Because it affects global non-proliferation efforts and relations with Western powers.

📚 Background

The implementation of the JCPOA hinges on resolving military dimension concerns.

📝 Key Evidence

"'If the JCPOA is implemented by the end of this month or mid-January...'"
→ Announcement of timeline for JCPOA implementation.
"'if there were obstacles to closing the file on the possible military dimensions... the implementation of the JCPOA would be halted'"
→ Warning about conditions for JCPOA implementation.
📡 Source: STATE MEDIA
📊 Confidence: 80%
Radio Farda is known for its critical stance on the Iranian government.

While Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister has conditioned the implementation of the Vienna nuclear agreement on resolving the issue of the possible military dimensions of Iran's nuclear program, the head of the Atomic Energy Organization predicted that this agreement would be implemented by mid-January. According to Fars News Agency, Ali Akbar Salehi said on Thursday, December 5, "If the JCPOA is implemented by the end of this month or mid-January, which according to my information we have made some progress, everything will go well and we will witness the implementation of the JCPOA." A day before Salehi's remarks, Abbas Araghchi, Iran's senior coordinator for the implementation of the nuclear agreement, warned the 5+1 group that if there were obstacles to closing the file on the possible military dimensions of Iran's nuclear activities (PMD), the implementation of the JCPOA would be halted, and "Iran would resume its nuclear activities." However, the Mehr News Agency quoted Salehi as saying that the negotiations between Araghchi and Iranian experts with agency officials have been "positive," and based on his assessment, "the outcome of this file (PMD) will be positive and within the framework of the national interests of the Islamic Republic of Iran." According to a confidential agreement between Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency, signed under the title "roadmap" on July 23, ambiguities regarding the possible military dimensions of Iran's previous nuclear program or PMD are to be resolved. Meanwhile, Yukiya Amano, the Director-General of the Agency, in his latest report, announced that he would present his final report to the Board of Governors of his organization on December 15. In another part of his remarks, the head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran stated that "perhaps all the costs related to nuclear technology, especially in the last 10 years, are equivalent to the costs necessary for the construction of two large dams." Salehi added, "This is while this amount of cost was also due to sanctions and the higher prices of purchasing some equipment, and part of the costs increased due to lost opportunities." He continued that "the budget we directly spent on nuclear technology is not even close to the figures that some have in mind for the construction of the Bushehr power plant." So far, Iranian officials have not announced a specific figure regarding the costs of Iran's nuclear program, and even Ahmad Shirzad, a representative from Isfahan in the sixth parliament, had previously stated that the costs of Iran's nuclear program were not transparent, and the parliament was not aware of these costs. Salehi's remarks come as Mohammad Saidi, a former deputy of the Atomic Energy Organization, had previously announced the cost of Iran's nuclear program to be less than two billion dollars in March 2015. Critics of Iran's nuclear program consider the costs of this program to be dozens of times higher than this figure.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →