Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
🟠 Important ❓ Unknown

Statement by Parastoo Farahvar and Arash Farahvar Regarding Claims by the Judiciary of the Islamic Republic - 2003-02-04

Jun 3, 2026 June 3, 2026 3 min read 📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway

Parastoo and Arash Farahvar issued a statement rejecting the claims of the Iranian judiciary regarding their parents' murder case, asserting they do not seek retribution but will not forgive the crimes committed. They criticize the judiciary for distorting facts and failing to bring the true perpetrators to justice, emphasizing the ongoing struggle against organized violence in Iran.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The Farahvars' statement underscores the need for transparency and justice in political murder cases in Iran.

👥 Key Players

Parastoo Farahvar (پرستو فره‌ور) ACTOR
Activist
"We have officially stated that we do not seek retribution for the convicted."
Arash Farahvar (آرش فره‌ور) ACTOR
Activist
"We have deemed this court incompetent from the very beginning."
Iranian judiciary (قوه قضائیه ایران) ACCUSED
Judicial authority
"This court intended to shift the responsibility of the retribution sentence for the convicts onto us."

⚡ Actions

Parastoo Farahvar and Arash Farahvar ANNOUNCE Iranian judiciary
"We have officially stated that we do not seek retribution for the convicted in this fabricated case."
Confidence: 90%
Parastoo Farahvar and Arash Farahvar CHALLENGE Iranian judiciary
"We have deemed this court incompetent from the very beginning."
Confidence: 90%
Parastoo Farahvar and Arash Farahvar PURSUE justice for their parents' murder
"The pursuit of justice for these crimes will never end with the trial of a few execution agents."
Confidence: 80%

📰 What Happened

Parastoo and Arash Farahvar challenge Iranian judiciary's handling of their parents' murder case.

  • Parastoo Farahvar and Arash Farahvar announce Iranian judiciary
  • Parastoo Farahvar and Arash Farahvar challenge Iranian judiciary
  • Parastoo Farahvar and Arash Farahvar pursue justice for their parents' murder

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Because it highlights ongoing issues of justice and accountability in Iran.
🌍 Regional: Because it reflects the broader struggle for human rights in the region.
🌐 International: Because it raises concerns about the Iranian government's handling of dissent and political violence.

📚 Background

The Farahvars' statement underscores the need for transparency and justice in political murder cases in Iran.

📝 Key Evidence

"The handling of the political murder cases... has only served to distort the truth."
→ This proves the judiciary's failure to deliver justice.
📡 Source: OPPOSITION
📊 Confidence: 80%
VOA Persian is known for its critical stance on the Iranian government.

Fellow compatriots: In the announcement by the Judicial Organization of the Armed Forces published on Tuesday, June 6, 1381 (May 27, 2002), we encountered a new trick from the authority handling the case of the murder of our parents, Dariush and Parvaneh Farahvar, which obliges us to provide the following explanations: - We have officially stated that we do not seek retribution for the convicted in this fabricated case, but this never means forgiveness for these crimes, which have been misrepresented in this announcement. In pursuing the case of our parents' murder, we have considered ourselves solely committed to the lofty ideals of those two freedom fighters, one of whose demands was the abolition of the death penalty. They courageously stated against the prevailing norms that: 'Life is the first and highest divine gift to every human being, and no individual, group, or institution has the right to take it away for any reason...' (Quoted from the announcement 'Towards the Abolition of the Death Penalty' published by the Secretariat of the Iran Nation Party on December 10, 1997). - Just as this court intended to shift the responsibility of the retribution sentence for the convicts onto us in the initial rulings, now, by distorting the facts, there is an attempt to burden us with the responsibility of the newly issued sentences. - We have deemed this court incompetent from the very beginning and, for this reason, refrained from participating in it. - The handling of the political murder cases from the fall of 1377 (1998) until now has, from our perspective, only served to distort the truth and conceal the main perpetrators of these organized crimes, and we recognize the naming of these misdeeds as justice as an additional injustice. - After the initial rulings were issued by the sham court and the case was referred to the Supreme Court, all our efforts to obtain information from the responsible officials regarding the details of this handling faced a wall of silence, and we have no official information about what transpired in this case that led to the issuance of new sentences. - Fellow compatriots, the extermination and murder of dissenters in Iran is an organized crime planned and executed by the fabric of violence woven into the institutions of power. The pursuit of justice for these crimes will never end with the trial of a few execution agents behind the closed doors of a sham court. In the presence of the wounded conscience of the nation and history, this bloody case remains open until the truths that have been hidden from the Iranian people for years through countless tricks are revealed in a competent court. June 7, 1381 Parastoo Farahvar - Arash Farahvar

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →