Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

The Academy of Persian Language: Ups and Downs

Feb 2, 2026 February 2, 2026 2 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

The article discusses the history and challenges faced by the Academy of Persian Language and Literature, highlighting its ongoing struggle to promote Persian vocabulary amidst public skepticism and political influences. Dariush Ashouri, a linguist, reflects on the Academy's evolution and the societal attitudes that affect its acceptance. This matter is significant as it underscores the cultural and linguistic identity challenges Iran faces in a modern context.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The Academy's struggles highlight the complexities of cultural preservation in a rapidly modernizing Iran.

👥 Key Players

Academy of Persian Language and Literature MENTIONED
Institution responsible for refining and promoting the Persian language
"Plays a crucial role in preserving and evolving the Persian language amidst globalization and foreign influences."
Gholamali Haddad Adel MENTIONED
Current head of the Academy
"Leads the Academy during a period of criticism and challenges in language acceptance."
Dariush Ashouri MENTIONED
Linguist, writer, and translator
"Provides critical insights into the Academy's functions and societal perceptions of language in Iran."

📰 What Happened

The Academy of Persian Language and Literature has faced ongoing challenges in promoting Persian vocabulary, with recent publications receiving little public attention. Linguist Dariush Ashouri discusses the Academy's historical context and the public's skepticism towards its efforts.

  • The Academy was established in 1935 and has been working to refine the Persian language for over 80 years.
  • Public discontent with the government has negatively impacted the Academy's acceptance and influence.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: This issue reflects broader societal attitudes towards government institutions and the importance of language in national identity.
🌍 Regional: Cultural preservation can influence regional identity and relations, particularly in a linguistically diverse area.
🌐 International: Language and cultural identity issues in Iran may affect international perceptions and relations with Western nations.

📚 Background

The Academy of Persian Language and Literature has historically aimed to protect the Persian language from foreign influences, which has become increasingly challenging in modern times.

Cultural identity in Iran Impact of globalization on language
📡 Source: NEUTRAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The article presents a balanced view of the Academy's challenges without overt political bias.

The Academy of Persian Language and Literature has been working for over 80 years to produce vocabulary and refine the Persian language against foreign languages since its establishment in 1935 under the presidency of the renowned scholar Mohammad Ali Foroughi, until the current Academy, managed by Gholamali Haddad Adel. However, apart from the first period, which ended in 1968, the Academy's failures have often overshadowed its successes. Recently, the latest series of vocabulary from this Academy was published in the months of Mehr and Aban, but as usual, it was released in silence. In this regard, I invited Dariush Ashouri, a linguist, writer, and translator, to come to the book review program to discuss these questions and others. In the program, Ashouri discusses the main responsibilities of the Academy since its inception, including the acceptance and rejection of words and terms, the refinement of the Persian language, and the importance of expanding the vocabulary and creating new words. He highlights that since the mid-19th century, Iran has faced a crisis in its traditional structures due to modern civilization, which has significantly impacted the language and terminology. Ashouri reflects on the public's negative perception of the Academy, attributing it to the general discontent with the government and regime, which leads to the rejection of any institution associated with it. He compares the first Academy's approach with the subsequent ones, noting that while the first Academy was influenced by a nationalist ideology, the second was more radical in its attempts to create a pure Persian language. Despite some successes, the later Academies have struggled to gain acceptance for their proposals, with Ashouri emphasizing the need for a scientific community to adopt and normalize new vocabulary. He concludes that the acceptance of new words is both an art and a science, requiring public familiarity and adaptation.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →