The best approach is to once and for all stop interfering in others' affairs. This article discusses the comments made by Hossein Derakhshan, who has precedence over all Iranian bloggers and has many rights over them. He mentions that it is unclear who is behind these blogs, which I find insulting. First, having a pen name or pseudonym is not exclusive to the 'Malakout Circle', and there are hundreds of blogs whose authors prefer not to use their real names for various reasons, and it is not our job to determine what is right or wrong in this regard. Furthermore, who said that the operators of these blogs are unknown? Derakhshan himself named five individuals and likely knew one or two others like Kianoush but omitted them. The foundation of this circle consists of several writers, journalists, and intellectuals whose works and friendships are known, and if Derakhshan prefers to reveal their names and reputations, that is his choice. The others neither practice secrecy nor wear masks; they write under their first names and are recognized by their presence in the Malakout Circle. I respect Derakhshan's precedence, but I do not appreciate him dictating terms for me and others. I do not even like his definition of a blog and find his term 'self-expression' neither eloquent nor sufficient. If we, the people, want to distance ourselves from a culture that inherently fosters secrecy, the best approach is to stop interfering in others' affairs once and for all and abandon the temptation to dictate what others should or shouldn't do. We must recognize that others have as much understanding and competence as we do regarding what to do, whether to reveal their names, and how to express themselves. If we have fought or are about to fight, it all boils down to the fact that this world does not revolve around me or you; everyone is central, and no one's rights are greater than another's. When voting or expressing opinions, we must maintain moderation and respect the preferences and choices of others, as long as they do not harm anyone.
The Best Approach is to Once and for All Stop Interfering in Others' Affairs
The article critiques Hossein Derakhshan's comments on anonymity in blogging, arguing for respect of individual choices and the importance of avoiding interference in others' affairs. It emphasizes that everyone has the right to express themselves as they choose, without judgment or dictation from others.
👥 Key Players
📰 What Happened
The article critiques Hossein Derakhshan's views on anonymity in blogging, emphasizing the importance of individual choice and non-interference in personal expression. It argues against the notion that anonymity is inherently problematic.
- Derakhshan criticized anonymous bloggers, suggesting that their identities should be known.
- The author defends the right to anonymity and self-expression in blogging.
💡 Why It Matters
📚 Background
Iran has a vibrant but heavily monitored blogging community where anonymity is often a necessity due to government censorship. Discussions about self-expression are crucial in the context of ongoing political and social challenges.
🏷️ Entities Mentioned
Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →
Translation confidence: 85%