Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

The Challenge of Diamonds Ahead of the British King's Coronation Ceremony; From 'Koh-i-Noor' to 'Cullinan'

Feb 13, 2026 February 13, 2026 2 min read 📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway

Buckingham Palace announced that the 'Koh-i-Noor' diamond will not be used in the upcoming coronation of King Charles, prompting South Africans to demand the return of the 'Cullinan' diamond. This situation highlights ongoing disputes over the ownership of significant historical diamonds, reflecting colonial legacies. The matter is significant as it raises questions about the restitution of cultural artifacts and the historical narratives surrounding them.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The decision not to use the Koh-i-Noor diamond in the coronation highlights ongoing disputes over colonial-era artifacts and their rightful ownership.

👥 Key Players

King Charles III MENTIONED
British monarch
"As the head of state, his decisions regarding royal artifacts reflect the ongoing legacy of colonialism."
South African government and citizens MENTIONED
Claimants for the return of the Cullinan diamond
"They represent a broader movement for restitution of cultural artifacts taken during colonial rule."
India, Iran, Pakistan, and Afghanistan MENTIONED
Countries involved in the historical ownership disputes of the Koh-i-Noor diamond
"Their claims highlight the complex history of colonialism and cultural heritage in the region."

📰 What Happened

Buckingham Palace announced that the Koh-i-Noor diamond will not be used in King Charles's coronation, leading South Africans to demand the return of the Cullinan diamond. This reflects ongoing disputes over ownership of significant diamonds linked to colonial history.

  • The Koh-i-Noor diamond has a contentious ownership history involving multiple countries.
  • The Cullinan diamond, the largest in the world, was gifted to the British crown by the colonial government of South Africa.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: The Koh-i-Noor's exclusion from the coronation ceremony underscores Iran's historical claims to the diamond, which is part of its cultural heritage.
🌍 Regional: The situation reflects broader regional tensions regarding historical grievances and cultural restitution.
🌐 International: It raises questions about how former colonial powers address the legacies of their past actions and the restitution of cultural artifacts.

📚 Background

The Koh-i-Noor and Cullinan diamonds symbolize the complex histories of colonialism and cultural appropriation. Their ownership disputes are emblematic of broader movements for restitution of cultural heritage.

Colonialism and its legacies Cultural restitution movements
📡 Source: NEUTRAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The article presents factual information without apparent bias, focusing on the implications of the royal decision.

After Buckingham Palace announced that the controversial diamond 'Koh-i-Noor' would not be used in the coronation ceremony of the British king, South Africans also demanded the return of the famous 'Cullinan' diamond to their country. Buckingham Palace announced on Wednesday that King Charles and Queen Camilla would use crowns worn by previous British monarchs during the coronation ceremony on May 6, but would not place the 'Koh-i-Noor' on any of the crowns to avoid repeating disputes. According to a statement from the British court, the king and queen will use crowns adorned with various jewels, including the 'Cullinan' diamond, which was transferred from South Africa to Britain during the colonial period. Following this announcement, a group of South Africans called on Britain to return the 'Cullinan', the largest diamond in the world, known as the Star of Africa, which is now part of the British royal jewels, to its original homeland. This diamond, weighing 530 carats, was discovered in South Africa in 1905 and was gifted to the British crown by the colonial government of the country, which was then under London’s rule. Although the 'Koh-i-Noor' diamond is not as large as the 'Cullinan', there have always been significant disputes over its ownership among India, Iran, Britain, and even Pakistan and Afghanistan since Nader Shah Afshar brought it to Iran after conquering India until it found its way to the British court. The 'Darya-ye Noor' diamond, a counterpart to the 'Koh-i-Noor', which was on the crown of the Queen of Iran before the revolution, is currently kept in the National Jewelry Museum of the Central Bank, a museum that has been closed to visitors for the past four years.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 90%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →