Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

The Expediency Discernment Council Deems Two Articles of the 'Hijab and Chastity' Bill Contrary to System Policies

Feb 6, 2026 February 6, 2026 2 min read 📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway

The Expediency Discernment Council has rejected two articles of the 'Chastity and Hijab' bill due to ambiguities in definitions that contradict the system's policies. The bill, which has faced significant criticism domestically and internationally, mandates strict adherence to hijab laws in various aspects of life. This situation highlights ongoing tensions regarding women's rights and government policies in Iran.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The rejection of certain articles in the hijab bill underscores ongoing tensions over women's rights and government policies in Iran.

👥 Key Players

Expediency Discernment Council MENTIONED
Advisory body to resolve disputes between the Iranian Parliament and the Guardian Council
"They play a crucial role in shaping legislation and ensuring it aligns with Iran's Islamic and political principles."
Guardian Council MENTIONED
Body that vets legislation and candidates for office
"They ensure laws comply with Islamic law and the Iranian constitution."
Reza Shafakhah MENTIONED
Head of the Child Rights Committee of the Iranian Bar Association (Scuda)
"His criticism highlights legal and human rights concerns regarding the bill."
Human rights organization Hengaw MENTIONED
Human rights organization
"They report on human rights abuses in Iran, providing international visibility."

📰 What Happened

The Expediency Discernment Council found two articles of the 'Chastity and Hijab' bill contrary to system policies due to ambiguities. The bill, which enforces strict hijab adherence, has faced criticism domestically and internationally.

  • The Council identified ambiguities in definitions related to hijab enforcement.
  • The bill has been criticized for violating children's rights and international conventions.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: The decision reflects internal tensions over women's rights and the government's control over personal freedoms.
🌍 Regional: Iran's policies can influence regional norms and affect its relations with neighboring countries.
🌐 International: The bill's criticism highlights Iran's human rights record, impacting its international relations and image.

📚 Background

The 'Chastity and Hijab' bill is part of Iran's broader efforts to enforce Islamic dress codes, a contentious issue since the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

Women's rights in Iran Iranian legislative process
📡 Source: INTERNATIONAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The source provides a balanced view but may emphasize international perspectives on human rights issues.

The Expediency Discernment Council has determined that two articles of the mandatory hijab bill, known as the 'Chastity and Hijab' bill, are contrary to the general policies of the system. In a meeting on Saturday, October 21, the council identified ambiguities in the definitions of terms such as 'impropriety, lack of hijab, and inappropriate dress' in clause 3 of article 13 of the 'Chastity and Hijab' bill as contrary to the general legislative policies of the system. This article mandates the Vice Presidency for Science and Technology to review its cooperation with knowledge-based companies and scientific centers that 'promote or advertise nudity, impropriety, lack of hijab, and inappropriate dress' or 'commit such behaviors.' The Supreme Supervisory Board of the Expediency Discernment Council also identified 'ambiguities in some expressions and the impact of reports on officials' decisions' in article 32 as contrary to the general policies of the system. Article 32 of the mandatory hijab bill conditions employment and access to job benefits on 'practical commitment to chastity and hijab in the workplace and outside of it and in cyberspace' based on 'documented public reports from supervisory authorities and agents.' The 'Chastity and Hijab' bill, initially prepared in 9 articles by the judiciary, was sent to the government and then to the parliament, where it was expanded to 72 articles after review in the parliamentary judicial committee. This bill, which imposes mandatory hijab without being presented in a public session and with minimal approval, has been sent to the Guardian Council for confirmation and implementation. The 'Chastity and Hijab' bill has faced widespread criticism both inside and outside Iran. Reza Shafakhah, head of the Child Rights Committee of the Iranian Bar Association (Scuda), described the hijab bill as a violation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Law on the Protection of Children and Adolescents. Additionally, a group of countries, led by Canada, issued a joint statement condemning the approval of the 'Chastity and Hijab' bill in the Iranian Parliament. Human rights organization Hengaw reported that Armita Garavand remains in a coma. A woman protesting mandatory hijab shouted 'Death to Khamenei'; police claimed she had a 'mental illness.' Mandatory hijab; threatening letters from 'security' to female students at Allameh University in Tehran.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →