Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

The High Council of Labor Fails to Determine Minimum Wage for the Third Time

Feb 4, 2026 February 4, 2026 3 min read 📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway

The High Council of Labor in Iran failed for the third time to set the minimum wage for workers, with significant discrepancies between labor and employer proposals. This ongoing deadlock highlights the government's struggle to balance economic pressures and worker needs, raising concerns about the adequacy of wages amid rising inflation.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The ongoing deadlock over minimum wage negotiations underscores the challenges facing Iranian workers amid rising inflation and government pressures.

👥 Key Players

High Council of Labor MENTIONED
Government body responsible for labor issues
"They play a critical role in determining labor policies and wage standards in Iran."
Alireza Mirghafari MENTIONED
Labor representative in the High Council of Labor
"He advocates for workers' rights and fair wage calculations."
Ebrahim Raisi MENTIONED
President of Iran
"His government is under pressure to address economic issues, including wage increases."

📰 What Happened

The High Council of Labor in Iran failed for the third consecutive session to agree on the minimum wage for workers, with significant gaps between labor and employer proposals. This deadlock reflects ongoing tensions between the government, employers, and labor representatives regarding fair compensation amid rising living costs.

  • Labor representatives proposed a minimum wage of 26.6 million tomans, while employers suggested 16.1 million tomans.
  • The discussions are critical as they impact the livelihoods of workers, especially with the upcoming Nowruz holidays.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: The failure to set a minimum wage exacerbates economic hardship for workers, potentially leading to unrest and dissatisfaction with the government.
🌍 Regional: Economic instability in Iran can have ripple effects on regional stability and labor movements in neighboring countries.
🌐 International: International observers may view this situation as indicative of Iran's broader economic challenges and governance issues.

📚 Background

Iran has been experiencing high inflation and economic difficulties, making the determination of a fair minimum wage crucial for workers' survival. The High Council of Labor is tasked with balancing the interests of workers and employers.

Inflation in Iran Labor rights in Iran
📡 Source: NEUTRAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The article appears to be based on reports from various Iranian news agencies, providing a balanced view of the ongoing negotiations.

The third session of the High Council of Labor to determine the minimum wage and the workers' livelihood basket for the upcoming year ended without results. According to reports from Iranian news agencies, in the third session held on Wednesday, March 14, all members including 4 labor representatives, 3 employers, the Minister of Labor, the Deputy Minister of Labor Relations, the representative of the Minister of Economy, the representative of the Minister of Industry, Mine and Trade, and the representative of the head of the Standard Organization were present. Some experts believe that the failure to reach a conclusion is due to the coordinated efforts of the government and employers to impose a minimal wage increase on the working community. Alireza Mirghafari, one of the four labor representatives in the High Council of Labor, explained the negotiations in this session to the ISNA news agency, stating, 'Our position regarding the cost of the basket is 26 million and 600 thousand tomans, while the employers' group proposed 16 million and 100 thousand tomans.' Mirghafari emphasized that the livelihood of workers would not improve even with a '40 to 50 percent increase' and would not cover living expenses. The proposals discussed in the wage determination session come as Majid Rahmati, head of the Wage Committee of the Coordination Council of Islamic Labor Councils of Tehran Province, stated on March 10 that the livelihood basket rate for Tehran, considering the prices of Bahman month, was calculated to be '32 million and 850 thousand tomans' for a four-member household with a caloric intake of 3,000. Wage sessions are ongoing while the government of Ebrahim Raisi is trying to appease the working community regarding a minimal wage increase, and in this regard, even the Ministry of Health has manipulated the daily caloric needs of workers. Mohsen Bagheri, a labor representative in the High Council of Labor, stated, 'The labor group's emphasis is on fair and logical calculation and pricing of the livelihood basket for workers' households, which should be the basis for determining wage increases.' The website 'Khabar Online' recently quoted Alireza Mirghafari, a member of the Wage Committee and a member of the Supreme Association of Labor Unions, saying, 'Unfortunately, some items were omitted in determining the food basket for workers, and the labor group insisted on restoring these items in the calculation of the workers' food basket.' This member of the Wage Committee of the High Council of Labor pointed out that agreement on the 'generalities and foundations' of determining the minimum livelihood basket amount for workers' households has been reached in the Wage Committee, but unfortunately, no agreement on the final amount has yet been reached among the labor, employer, and government groups in the Wage Committee. Given the current trend, some observers predict that the determination of the minimum wage for workers by the Wage Committee of the High Council of Labor will continue until the last hours of the year, as it did last year, ultimately leaving no opportunity for collective worker response with the arrival of the Nowruz holidays.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →