Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

The Movement of SUVs in the Path of Parliament; Fereydoun Abbasi: Why Should We Make a Scene and Get Stuck on SUVs?

Feb 7, 2026 February 7, 2026 3 min read 📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway

The impeachment of Minister Reza Fatemi Amin has sparked a conflict over the allocation of SUVs to Parliament members, with Fereydoun Abbasi questioning the need for such allocations. The government initially denied the allocations but later confirmed them, leading to calls for transparency from other representatives. This controversy highlights ongoing tensions between the government and Parliament in Iran.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The allocation of SUVs to Parliament members amid political turmoil raises questions about governance and accountability in Iran.

👥 Key Players

Reza Fatemi Amin MENTIONED
Former Minister of Industry, Mines, and Trade
"His impeachment reflects the fragility of government positions and parliamentary confidence in Iran."
Fereydoun Abbasi MENTIONED
Member of Parliament and Energy Commission
"His comments highlight internal conflicts within Parliament regarding government actions and public sentiment."
Ahmad Alireza Beigi MENTIONED
Member of Parliament and whistleblower
"He brought attention to the SUV allocation issue, triggering a significant political controversy."
Hassan Darvishian MENTIONED
Head of the Special Inspection Office of the President
"His statements provide insight into government accountability and the handling of parliamentary affairs."

📰 What Happened

The impeachment of Minister Reza Fatemi Amin has led to a controversy over the allocation of SUVs to members of Parliament, with initial denials from officials turning into confirmations of the allocations. Fereydoun Abbasi's remarks questioning the need for these vehicles have sparked public backlash and calls for transparency.

  • Over 100 SUVs were allocated to members of Parliament, confirmed after initial denials.
  • The controversy has intensified tensions between the government and Parliament.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: This controversy underscores the deepening rift between the government and Parliament, reflecting broader issues of governance and public trust.
🌍 Regional: The internal conflict may affect Iran's political stability, which has implications for regional dynamics and relations with neighboring countries.
🌐 International: International observers may view this as a sign of political instability, potentially impacting Iran's diplomatic relations and negotiations.

📚 Background

Iran's political landscape is marked by tensions between different factions within the government and Parliament, often leading to public discontent and calls for reform.

Political accountability in Iran Parliamentary governance and its challenges
📡 Source: NEUTRAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The article presents a factual account of events, but the interpretation may vary based on the reader's perspective on Iranian politics.

The fallout from the impeachment of Reza Fatemi Amin, the Minister of Industry, Mines, and Trade, who was removed from his position due to a lack of parliamentary confidence, has led to a new conflict between Parliament and the government over the allocation of "100 SUVs to members of Parliament." In a recent development, Fereydoun Abbasi, a member of the Energy Commission of Parliament, stated: "Why should we make a scene and get stuck on SUVs? How much does an SUV cost?" These remarks have sparked reactions from some users on social media. The news of the allocation of SUVs to representatives, which was revealed ahead of the impeachment of the former Minister of Industry by the representative of Tabriz, Ahmad Alireza Beigi, was initially met with denial from several officials in the Islamic Consultative Assembly and the government. However, after the parliamentary vote of no confidence against Reza Fatemi Amin, government officials, with a clear change of stance, not only confirmed the allocation of SUVs to members of Parliament but also announced that the number exceeded "one hundred vehicles." According to the head of the Special Inspection Office of the President, from 2021 to mid-2022, more than one hundred vehicles were allocated to some representatives at factory prices and without a lottery. The announcement of the allocation of more than one hundred vehicles comes while Ahmad Alireza Beigi, the whistleblower, had previously stated that the number of SUVs allocated to representatives was between 70 to 75 units. Hassan Darvishian, the head of the Special Inspection Office of the President, exonerated Reza Fatemi Amin by saying: "The former Minister of Industry had no knowledge of the occurrence or details of this matter." This confirmation from the government official regarding the allocation of vehicles led to criticism from some representatives, including Fereydoun Abbasi, a member of Parliament and the Energy Commission. The former head of the Atomic Energy Organization said: "Why should we make a scene and get stuck on SUVs? How much does an SUV cost?" This representative's remarks faced negative reactions from many social media users. One user criticized Fereydoun Abbasi's comments, referring to poverty and some people's resorting to selling their kidneys. Several members of Parliament also called for the publication of the names of those who received SUVs. Jalil Rahimi Jahangir, a member of Parliament, also emphasized the need for transparency in this matter. Although some, like Mohammad Mohajeri, a principlist journalist, believe that the current dispute between Parliament and the government is a form of revenge by government supporters against the Qalibaf faction. The issue of the gift of 70 SUVs to representatives has also drawn in President Raisi.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →