Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

The Quran: The Word of God or the Word of Muhammad?

Jan 28, 2026 January 28, 2026 2 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

Hassan Yousefi Eshkevari and Soroush Dabbagh engage in a debate about whether the Quran is the divine word of God or a prophetic text from Muhammad. The discussion explores the nature of revelation, the historical context of faith, and the implications of interpreting the Quran in contemporary society. This debate is significant as it reflects ongoing tensions within Islamic thought regarding the nature of scripture.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The discussion on the Quran's nature underscores significant theological debates that resonate within and beyond Iran.

👥 Key Players

Hassan Yousefi Eshkevari MENTIONED
Religious scholar
"Eshkevari is significant for his contributions to discussions on Islamic thought and interpretation of religious texts in Iran."
Soroush Dabbagh MENTIONED
Researcher in philosophy and religion
"Dabbagh represents contemporary philosophical perspectives on religion, challenging traditional views and encouraging critical thought."

📰 What Happened

A debate took place between Hassan Yousefi Eshkevari and Soroush Dabbagh regarding the nature of the Quran, questioning whether it is divine or prophetic. The discussion highlighted differing interpretations of revelation and the implications for understanding the Quran in modern society.

  • Eshkevari argues that the Quran is both divine and historical.
  • Dabbagh suggests that interpreting the Quran as prophetic undermines its sacred origins.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: The debate reflects internal tensions within Iranian society regarding religious interpretation and modernity, which can impact social cohesion and governance.
🌍 Regional: This discussion may influence broader Islamic discourse in the region, potentially affecting sectarian dynamics and interfaith relations.
🌐 International: Internationally, the debate highlights the complexities of Islamic belief systems, which can inform Western understanding of Islam and its diverse interpretations.

📚 Background

The Quran is the central religious text of Islam, and its interpretation has been a subject of debate among scholars, particularly regarding its divine versus human aspects.

Islamic theology Modernity and religion
📡 Source: NEUTRAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The article presents a balanced view of the debate, reflecting diverse perspectives within Islamic scholarship.

The Quran, the holy text of Muslims, is it divine or prophetic? Was the Quran revealed to the Prophet Muhammad? Did the Prophet Muhammad see the Quran in dreams and visions? What is revelation, and how can we justify and define God's communication with humanity? In this week's taboo discussion, Hassan Yousefi Eshkevari, a religious scholar, and Soroush Dabbagh, a researcher in philosophy and religion, debate these questions. Mr. Eshkevari begins the program by asking whether the Quran is divine or prophetic. He states that the prevailing belief among Muslims has been that the Quran is a divine word revealed to Muhammad, despite some ambiguities in this traditional view. Dabbagh counters by discussing the implications of calling the Quran prophetic, suggesting it lacks a sacred origin. He references contemporary religious thinkers who have explored the nature of revelation, emphasizing that the language of the Quran is human and that the experience of revelation is complex. Eshkevari responds by discussing the historical context of faith in Muhammad and the nature of revelation, asserting that the Quran is both divine and historical. The discussion raises questions about the nature of divine communication and the human experience of revelation, ultimately reflecting on the challenges of understanding the Quran's origins in a modern context.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →