Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

The Regime Change in Baghdad Will Help Advance the Middle East Peace Process - 2002-05-16

Feb 12, 2026 February 12, 2026 1 min read 📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway

A senior U.S. Defense official argues that a new Iraqi government would facilitate the Israeli-Palestinian peace process. Paul Wolfowitz identifies Iraq and Iran as major obstacles and emphasizes the threat posed by Saddam Hussein's support for violence and weapons production. This perspective reflects U.S. policy intentions in the region during the early 2000s.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The U.S. believed that changing the Iraqi regime could facilitate peace efforts between Israel and the Palestinians.

👥 Key Players

Paul Wolfowitz MENTIONED
Deputy Secretary of Defense, U.S.
"A key architect of U.S. foreign policy in the early 2000s, advocating for regime change in Iraq and influencing U.S. stance towards Iran."
Saddam Hussein MENTIONED
President of Iraq
"His regime was viewed as a significant threat to regional stability and a supporter of anti-Israel violence."

📰 What Happened

Paul Wolfowitz stated that the establishment of a new government in Iraq would help advance the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, citing Saddam Hussein's support for violence as a major obstacle. He emphasized the dangers posed by Iraq's biological weapons program.

  • Wolfowitz identifies Iraq and Iran as major disruptors of peace in the Middle East.
  • The U.S. government was actively considering regime change in Iraq as part of its broader strategy.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Iran viewed U.S. actions in Iraq as a direct threat to its influence in the region and a potential precursor to U.S. actions against itself.
🌍 Regional: The removal of Saddam Hussein was seen as a potential shift in power dynamics in the Middle East, impacting relations between Israel, Palestine, and neighboring countries.
🌐 International: This perspective reflects U.S. intentions to reshape the Middle East, which had implications for global security and international relations.

📚 Background

In the early 2000s, the U.S. was focused on combating terrorism and perceived threats from regimes like Iraq and Iran, which were seen as supporting anti-Israel activities.

U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East The Iraq War
📡 Source: INTERNATIONAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The statement reflects the official U.S. government perspective, which may be biased towards justifying military intervention.

A senior U.S. Defense Department official believes that the establishment of a new government in Iraq will help advance the peace process between Israel and the Palestinians. Paul Wolfowitz, Deputy Secretary of Defense, told reporters on Wednesday that Iraq and Iran are two major disruptors of the peace process. He added that Saddam Hussein, the leader of Iraq, is someone who supports suicide bombers with his words and money, thereby only exacerbating violence. Mr. Wolfowitz is among the senior officials in the Bush administration who advocate for the removal of the Iraqi president from power. He also stated that Iraq's efforts to produce biological weapons for mass destruction create a dangerous situation, and said we cannot live indefinitely with these weapons.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →