Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
🔴 Breaking ❓ Unknown

The White House Says Iran Has Not Retreated from Threatening to Attack Israel

Jul 10, 2026 July 10, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

The White House has stated that Iran has not backed down from its threats to attack Israel, especially following the assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh. U.S. officials are closely monitoring the situation and have increased military presence in the region to support Israel. The ongoing tensions and potential for conflict highlight the fragile state of Middle Eastern geopolitics.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The situation remains volatile with potential for military conflict.

👥 Key Players

John Kirby QUOTED
Spokesperson for the White House National Security Council
"Iran has not retreated from its threat to attack Israel."
Ali Khamenei (علی خامنه‌ای) QUOTED
Supreme Leader of Iran
"Ali Khamenei has promised 'blood vengeance' in this regard."
Joe Biden QUOTED
President of the United States
"Reaching a ceasefire agreement in the Gaza war could prevent Iran from attacking Israel."
Benjamin Netanyahu QUOTED
Prime Minister of Israel
"Yahya Sinwar is the main obstacle to the agreement."
Ismail Haniyeh (اسماعیل هنیه) TARGET
Head of the political bureau of Hamas
"The killing of Ismail Haniyeh... in Tehran."
Hamas ACTOR
Palestinian militant group
"Hamas announced on August 24 that it would not participate in the new round of ceasefire negotiations."

⚡ Actions

John Kirby ANNOUNCE Iran
"Iran has not retreated from its threat to attack Israel."
Confidence: 90%
Iran THREATEN Israel
"Iran has repeatedly threatened retaliatory action against Israel."
Confidence: 90%
U.S. military DEPLOY Iran, Hezbollah
"The U.S. military has recently deployed the most military equipment and personnel in various locations in the region."
Confidence: 80%

📰 What Happened

White House warns Iran may attack Israel amid threats of retaliation for Haniyeh's assassination.

  • John Kirby announce Iran
  • Iran threaten Israel
  • U.S. military deploy Iran, Hezbollah

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Because Iran's threats could escalate military tensions and impact its regional influence.
🌍 Regional: Because an attack on Israel could destabilize the Middle East further.
🌐 International: Because U.S. military presence is heightened in response to Iranian threats.

📚 Background

The situation remains volatile with potential for military conflict.

📝 Key Evidence

"Iran has not retreated from its threat to attack Israel."
→ Indicates ongoing threats from Iran towards Israel.
"Ali Khamenei has promised 'blood vengeance' in this regard."
→ Demonstrates Iran's commitment to retaliate against Israel.
"The U.S. military has recently deployed the most military equipment and personnel in various locations in the region."
→ Shows U.S. military readiness in response to Iranian threats.
📡 Source: INDEPENDENT
📊 Confidence: 80%
Radio Farda is known for its critical stance on the Iranian government.

The spokesperson for the White House National Security Council stated that there is information indicating that Iran has not retreated from its threat to attack Israel. John Kirby said in a video interview with Politico on Thursday, August 25, that Iran may carry out an attack in the coming days with the help of Hezbollah or the Houthis, but he expressed hope that such an event would not occur and that Tehran would withdraw from this threat. Since the killing of Ismail Haniyeh, the head of the political bureau of the extremist group Hamas, in Tehran, the Islamic Republic of Iran has repeatedly threatened retaliatory action against Israel. Hamas is listed as a terrorist organization by the United States and the European Union. Although Israeli officials have not confirmed or denied their role in the assassination of Ismail Haniyeh, Iranian officials are threatening retaliation against Israel, and Ali Khamenei, the leader of the Islamic Republic, has promised 'blood vengeance' in this regard. British Prime Minister in contact with medical professionals: War benefits no one. Joe Biden, the President of the United States, said on August 23 in New Orleans that reaching a ceasefire agreement in the Gaza war could prevent Iran from attacking Israel in response to the killing of Ismail Haniyeh, emphasizing that he expects this outcome. Mr. Kirby reiterated in his conversation with Politico that Washington is closely monitoring the regional situation and is prepared. The U.S. military has recently deployed the most military equipment and personnel in various locations in the region to assist Israel against potential attacks from Iran and Hezbollah. The U.S. military deployment is considered the largest gathering of American troops in the region since their withdrawal from Iraq in previous years. With increasing concerns about a military attack by Iran on Israel, Western countries issued two separate statements warning Tehran to refrain from escalating tensions; these warnings were also reiterated in phone calls between the British Prime Minister and the German Chancellor with the Iranian President. The U.S. government previously stated that reaching an agreement on a ceasefire in Gaza is still possible, while warning that rapid progress in these negotiations is vital to prevent the escalation of war in the region. However, Hamas announced on August 24 that it would not participate in the new round of ceasefire negotiations in Gaza that began on Thursday in Qatar. An informed source told Reuters that mediators would consult with Hamas representatives after these negotiations. Hamas, expressing doubt about the success of this round of negotiations, holds Israel responsible for obstructing and preventing an agreement. In contrast, Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of Israel, claims that Yahya Sinwar, the new leader of Hamas, is the main obstacle to the agreement.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →