Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Three Cultural Institutions: The Hijab Law is 'Anti-National and Divisive'

Jan 23, 2026 January 23, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

Three cultural institutions in Iran have condemned the new 'Chastity and Hijab' law as anti-national and divisive, calling for its repeal. They argue that the law lacks public support and threatens social cohesion, particularly by imposing strict hijab requirements on minors. This matter is significant as it reflects growing dissent against government policies and the potential for increased societal division.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The backlash against the 'Chastity and Hijab' law underscores significant societal tensions in Iran regarding personal freedoms and government control.

👥 Key Players

House of Cinema MENTIONED
Cultural Institution
"Represents the film industry and cultural expression in Iran, advocating for artistic freedom."
House of Theatre MENTIONED
Cultural Institution
"Represents theater artists and promotes cultural dialogue and expression."
House of Music MENTIONED
Cultural Institution
"Represents musicians and the music industry, crucial for cultural identity and expression."
Masoud Pezeshkian MENTIONED
President of Iran
"A high-ranking government official whose criticism reflects internal dissent within the government."
Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf MENTIONED
Speaker of the Islamic Consultative Assembly
"Key legislative figure responsible for the introduction and enforcement of the controversial law."

📰 What Happened

Three cultural institutions in Iran condemned the new 'Chastity and Hijab' law as anti-national and divisive, calling for its repeal. They argue that the law is unlikely to gain public acceptance and threatens social cohesion, especially by imposing strict hijab requirements on minors.

  • The law imposes heavy fines on women for not adhering to hijab requirements and mandates hijab for girls aged 9 to 15.
  • The law requires ride-hailing drivers to report passengers' adherence to hijab, expanding surveillance and enforcement.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: This law and the backlash against it highlight the growing societal divisions and resistance to government policies, particularly regarding women's rights.
🌍 Regional: The situation in Iran could inspire similar movements in neighboring countries facing issues of governance and women's rights.
🌐 International: International observers may view this dissent as indicative of broader human rights concerns in Iran, potentially affecting diplomatic relations.

📚 Background

Iran has a complex history of laws governing personal conduct, particularly regarding women's rights, which has led to ongoing social tensions. The enforcement of hijab laws has been a contentious issue since the Islamic Revolution in 1979.

Women's rights in Iran Government censorship and cultural expression
📡 Source: NEUTRAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The article presents statements from cultural institutions and government officials, reflecting a range of opinions within Iranian society.

Three cultural institutions in Iran have issued a statement labeling the recent law known as 'Chastity and Hijab' as 'anti-national and divisive' and have called for its repeal. The House of Cinema, the House of Theatre, and the House of Music of Iran stated in their statement that this law 'will never have public acceptance for implementation.' The statement, a copy of which was published on the House of Cinema's website on Wednesday, December 14, asserts that 'we find it necessary to express our serious concerns regarding the law known as 'Hijab and Chastity.' It adds that 'the widespread concern is directed at the anti-national and divisive spirit of this law, which its authors, disregarding principles of wisdom and rationality and the need for social acceptance, are expanding the scope of criminalization beyond half of the society, igniting the most unprecedented and largest grounds for national division, which only suggests a predominant intention to undermine social tranquility.' Masoud Pezeshkian, the President of Iran, also criticized the 'Chastity and Hijab' law on December 12, stating that its implementation is not feasible, that society will not accept it, and that it will create dissatisfaction. Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, the Speaker of the Islamic Consultative Assembly, announced on December 7 that the 'Chastity and Hijab' law would be implemented on December 23. The announcement of this news and the publication of details of this parliamentary resolution, officially titled 'The Law for Supporting Families through Promoting the Culture of Chastity and Hijab,' has prompted widespread reactions from legal experts, political activists, civil figures, and social media users. The 'Chastity and Hijab' law not only permits heavy fines against women for not adhering to the government's hijab requirements but also stipulates that girls aged 9 to 15 are required to observe mandatory hijab and will face fines and 'educational' measures for 'violating hijab.' The law also imposes heavy fines for the failure to provide surveillance camera footage by the managers of complexes and towns, as well as for designing and advertising clothing, toys, signs, or mannequins that promote the unveiling of hijab. According to this law, drivers of ride-hailing services are required to report on the adherence to mandatory hijab by passengers. The three cultural institutions further stated in their statement: 'In our opinion, as members of the cultural and artistic community, a law that deems children guilty with just a sneer and considers separation from family, prison, and reform centers necessary for them will never have public acceptance for implementation.' The statement adds that a law that considers living in the homeland as 'punishment' has no meaning other than turning the concept of homeland into a large prison. The House of Cinema, the House of Theatre, and the House of Music of Iran have called upon 'great thinkers, legal experts, and sociologists' to 'prevent the implementation of this bad and divisive law with logic, reasoning, and goodwill.'

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →