Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Trump: Obama Wiretapped My Phones During the 2016 Election Campaign

Jan 28, 2026 January 28, 2026 2 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

Donald Trump accused Barack Obama of wiretapping his phones during the 2016 election campaign without providing evidence. This claim has sparked controversy and echoes the historical Watergate scandal. The implications of such allegations could affect public trust in political processes.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: Trump's wiretapping allegations against Obama could have significant implications for public trust in government and political accountability.

👥 Key Players

Donald Trump MENTIONED
President of the United States
"As a key figure in U.S. politics, Trump's statements can influence public opinion and political discourse."
Barack Obama MENTIONED
Former President of the United States
"Obama's presidency represents a significant era in U.S. history, and accusations against him can impact his legacy and public perception."

📰 What Happened

Donald Trump accused Barack Obama of wiretapping his phones during the 2016 election campaign without providing evidence. This claim has reignited discussions about political surveillance and trust in government.

  • Trump claimed the wiretapping occurred in October 2016 during his campaign.
  • He compared the allegation to the Watergate scandal, which involved illegal surveillance.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: The allegations may distract from U.S. foreign policy discussions, including those related to Iran, potentially affecting diplomatic relations.
🌍 Regional: In the Middle East, U.S. political stability is crucial for regional dynamics, including Iran's influence and actions.
🌐 International: The claims could undermine international trust in U.S. political processes and institutions.

📚 Background

The Watergate scandal was a major political scandal in the 1970s involving illegal activities by the Nixon administration, leading to Nixon's resignation. Trump's claims evoke this historical context to highlight perceived abuses of power.

Political surveillance U.S. election integrity
📡 Source: INTERNATIONAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
Reuters is generally considered a reliable news source, but the context of the claims should be critically evaluated.

Donald Trump, the President of the United States, accused former President Barack Obama on Saturday, March 4, of wiretapping his phones in October 2016. According to Reuters, Trump claimed this occurred late in his election campaign but did not provide evidence to support his allegation. In one of several tweets on the matter, Trump wrote: "What level has President Obama descended to, to be wiretapping my phones during the very sacred election process? This is worse than Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy!" His reference is to the Watergate scandal involving former Republican President Richard Nixon, which began when some of Nixon's associates illegally entered the Democratic National Committee headquarters at Watergate on June 17, 1972, and planted microphones. Reuters reported that Barack Obama's office has not yet responded to the news agency's request for comment. The White House also did not respond to the news agency's request for further clarification on Trump's statements. However, Trump tweeted that "this wiretapping" was done at Trump Tower in New York, where he lived and worked before moving to the White House, "but [the wiretappers] found nothing." Trump added in another tweet: "Is it legal for a sitting president to be wiretapping a campaign before an election?" He continued in another message that "I bet a good lawyer could make a case out of the fact that President Obama was wiretapping my phone in October, just prior to Election!" On Saturday, CNN also reported that it had attempted to contact Barack Obama regarding this matter but had not yet succeeded.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →