Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Trump Says He Accepts 'One State' Solution for Israel and Palestinians

Jan 28, 2026 January 28, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

Donald Trump has indicated a willingness to accept either a one-state or two-state solution for Israel and Palestine, diverging from traditional U.S. policy. This shift has drawn reactions from both the UN and Palestinian leadership, emphasizing the ongoing complexities in the region. The implications of this new stance could significantly alter U.S. foreign policy and peace efforts.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: Trump's acceptance of a one-state solution could reshape U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East and complicate the Israeli-Palestinian peace process.

👥 Key Players

Donald Trump MENTIONED
President of the United States
"As the U.S. President, Trump's foreign policy decisions significantly impact the Middle East, including Iran's geopolitical strategies."
Benjamin Netanyahu MENTIONED
Prime Minister of Israel
"Netanyahu's policies and positions on Israel-Palestine relations influence regional stability and U.S.-Israel relations."
Antonio Guterres MENTIONED
Secretary-General of the United Nations
"Guterres represents the international community's stance on peace in the Middle East and advocates for the two-state solution."
Mahmoud Abbas MENTIONED
President of the Palestinian Authority
"Abbas's leadership is crucial for Palestinian governance and negotiations with Israel, impacting regional dynamics."

📰 What Happened

Donald Trump announced his acceptance of either a one-state or two-state solution for Israel and Palestine after meeting with Netanyahu, marking a shift from traditional U.S. policy. This statement has prompted reactions from both the UN and Palestinian leadership, highlighting the complexities of the peace process.

  • Trump's remarks indicate a departure from the longstanding U.S. support for a two-state solution.
  • Netanyahu emphasized the need for Palestinian recognition of Israel as a Jewish state.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Iran views U.S. policy shifts as opportunities to strengthen its influence in the region and support for Palestinian groups.
🌍 Regional: This shift could exacerbate tensions between Israel and Palestine and affect Iran's relationships with both parties.
🌐 International: The international community, particularly the UN, may see this as a setback for peace efforts and a challenge to established diplomatic norms.

📚 Background

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has persisted for decades, with the two-state solution being the internationally accepted framework for peace. Trump's remarks signal a potential shift in U.S. policy that could have lasting implications.

Israeli settlements in the West Bank U.S.-Israel relations
📡 Source: INTERNATIONAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The article presents a summary of events and reactions from multiple stakeholders, providing a balanced view of the situation.

Donald Trump, the President of the United States, following his meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, stated that he accepts 'any solution' that Israel and the Palestinians can agree upon, whether it leads to a two-state or a one-state solution. The Secretary-General of the United Nations and the Palestinian Authority have reacted to this. Over the years, both Republican and Democratic administrations have consistently pursued a policy aimed at establishing 'two independent states' for Israel and Palestine side by side. Previous U.S. presidents' efforts in this regard have been fruitless. Now, Trump's remarks indicate a new approach from the U.S. government and a departure from the insistence on a 'two-state' solution. On February 15, after his first meeting as president with Netanyahu, Trump said, 'I look at [the formation of] both two states and one state. I am okay with whatever way both parties want to go.' The U.S. President also expressed his willingness to work towards peace between Israel and the Palestinians but emphasized that this requires compromise from both sides, and ultimately, they are the ones who will reach the terms of any potential agreement. Trump also asked Israel to 'halt' its settlement activities 'for a while.' Regarding the relocation of the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, he expressed his desire for it to happen and stated that he is reviewing this matter 'very carefully. Let's see what happens.' Netanyahu, during a joint press conference with Trump, stated that peace between the parties would only be possible if the Palestinians recognize a 'Jewish state' and that control of the West Bank should ultimately remain with Israel. Reactions: On February 15, the UN Secretary-General stated that there is no alternative solution to the establishment of two independent states. Antonio Guterres, who was in Cairo for a visit, said, 'There is no alternative solution regarding the situation between the Palestinians and Israel; except for the two-state solution, and we must do everything we can to achieve this goal.' Mahmoud Abbas, the President of the Palestinian Authority, also stated that he remains committed to the establishment of two independent states to end the crisis between the two parties. Abbas's office issued a statement saying he agrees with Trump's remarks about halting settlement activities, including in the occupied part of Jerusalem, but he still insists that two independent states must be established. Palestinian Authority officials had previously called for the commitment to the establishment of two independent states not to be abandoned before the meeting of Trump and Netanyahu. Before the meeting of the U.S. and Israeli leaders, a U.S. official told Reuters that Trump supports the ultimate goal of peace between Israel and the Palestinians, even if the solution of creating two independent states is not feasible.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →