Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Trump: Seven Trillion Dollars Foolishly Spent in the Middle East

Jan 26, 2026 January 26, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

Donald Trump criticized previous U.S. spending in the Middle East while threatening to cut aid to countries voting against the U.S. decision on Jerusalem. Jordan and Egypt, major U.S. aid recipients, voted in favor of the UN resolution opposing Trump's decision. This situation highlights the complex dynamics of U.S. foreign aid and Middle Eastern politics.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: Trump's criticism of U.S. spending and threats to cut aid highlight the complexities of U.S. foreign relations in the Middle East.

👥 Key Players

Donald Trump MENTIONED
Former U.S. President
"His policies and statements significantly influence U.S. foreign relations, particularly in the Middle East."
Mahmoud Abbas MENTIONED
President of the Palestinian Authority
"He represents Palestinian interests and is a key player in the Israeli-Palestinian peace process."
Jordan MENTIONED
U.S. ally and recipient of aid
"Jordan's stability is crucial for U.S. interests in the region, especially regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict."
Egypt MENTIONED
U.S. ally and recipient of aid
"Egypt plays a significant role in regional politics and is a key partner in U.S. efforts to stabilize the Middle East."

📰 What Happened

Donald Trump criticized past U.S. spending in the Middle East and threatened to cut aid to countries that voted against the U.S. recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital. Jordan and Egypt, major recipients of U.S. aid, voted in favor of a UN resolution opposing Trump's decision.

  • The UN General Assembly passed a resolution with 128 votes against the U.S. decision regarding Jerusalem.
  • Jordan receives $1.2 billion and Egypt receives $1.3 billion annually in U.S. aid.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Iran may view U.S. aid dynamics as an opportunity to strengthen its influence in the region by supporting anti-U.S. sentiments.
🌍 Regional: The aid cuts could destabilize Jordan and Egypt, impacting regional security and the peace process.
🌐 International: Trump's remarks could influence U.S. relations with allies and adversaries, affecting global perceptions of U.S. foreign policy.

📚 Background

The U.S. has historically provided significant financial aid to Jordan and Egypt as part of its strategy to maintain stability in the Middle East. The recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital has heightened tensions in the region.

U.S. foreign aid Israeli-Palestinian conflict
📡 Source: INTERNATIONAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The article presents a range of perspectives from various officials and experts, indicating a balanced approach to reporting.

Current and former Jordanian officials say that the United States is unlikely to cut its aid to the country due to its vote against the U.S. decision regarding Jerusalem. This comes as Donald Trump continues his criticism of the strategies of previous U.S. presidents, stating that it was 'foolish' to spend seven trillion dollars in the Middle East. The United Nations General Assembly on Thursday, December 30, passed a non-binding resolution opposing the recent decision by the U.S. President to recognize Jerusalem as the 'capital of Israel' with the votes of 128 out of 193 members, including Arab countries. According to Reuters, this resolution was proposed by Egypt, and all members of the Security Council except the U.S. voted in favor. Prior to the resolution's approval, Donald Trump threatened that countries voting in favor would see their U.S. aid cut or reduced. On Friday, Trump tweeted: 'After spending seven trillion dollars foolishly in the Middle East, it is time to rebuild our country.' These remarks seem to align with his statements during the announcement of the new U.S. security strategy, where he emphasized his campaign slogan of prioritizing America and blamed previous leaders for their inability to focus on American citizens. Trump highlighted the strong economic performance during his presidency, stating that 'our leaders were busy building countries outside while failing to build our own.' Reuters notes that Jordan and Egypt are among the largest recipients of U.S. financial aid. However, both countries are so involved in the Israeli-Palestinian peace process that they voted in favor of the resolution despite these threats. A Jordanian minister told Reuters: 'Americans know better than anyone that a stable Jordan is vital for U.S. interests in the region.' The report states that Jordan receives $1.2 billion annually from the U.S. for defense cooperation and other activities. This unnamed Jordanian minister added: 'We do not expect the U.S. government to touch this aid, but if it happens, it will only exacerbate Jordan's economic problems.' Meanwhile, former Jordanian Prime Minister Taher al-Masri predicted that given Jordan's role as a regional ally in a chaotic and unstable Middle East, there will likely be no change in this aid. Al-Masri stated: 'The U.S. does not help us as a charity. Jordan plays a role in regional stability and has not fallen short in this regard.' However, some Jordanian officials have privately expressed concerns about the possibility of U.S. aid cuts. In this context, H.M. Hillier, an expert on Egypt at the Atlantic Council, told Reuters that Egypt is likely confident that despite Trump's threats, no one will touch the $1.3 billion in U.S. aid to the country. Meanwhile, Mahmoud Abbas, the President of the Palestinian Authority, called the UN General Assembly's resolution 'a repudiation of Trump's decision' regarding Jerusalem, stating: 'Blackmail and intimidation will not prevent the realization of Palestinian rights.' Abbas also mentioned on Friday in Paris that he had discussed the consequences of Trump's decision with the King and Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia in Riyadh over the past two days.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →