Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
🔴 Breaking ❓ Unknown

U.S. State Department Spokesperson: We Hope to Reach a Comprehensive Agreement by the End of March

Jul 7, 2026 July 7, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

The U.S. State Department spokesperson expressed hope for a comprehensive agreement with Iran by the end of March, emphasizing a mutual commitment to avoid new sanctions during ongoing negotiations. This comes amidst congressional efforts to increase sanctions against Iran, highlighting the complex dynamics of U.S.-Iran relations.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The U.S. aims for a significant nuclear agreement with Iran by March 31, avoiding new sanctions.

👥 Key Players

Jen Psaki QUOTED
U.S. State Department Spokesperson
"We hope to reach a comprehensive agreement with Tehran by March 31."
John Kerry QUOTED
Secretary of State
"Secretary of State John Kerry is in close contact with members of the U.S. Congress."
Mohammad Javad Zarif (محمدجواد ظریف) QUOTED
Iranian Foreign Minister
"The goal is to reach a political agreement in the 'shortest time' within 'four months'."
AIPAC QUOTED
Pro-Israel Lobby
"It is now essential for Congress to pass new sanctions laws."

⚡ Actions

U.S. State Department ANNOUNCE Iran, P5+1
"We hope to reach a comprehensive agreement with Tehran by March 31 that 'will assure the world of the peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear program.'"
Confidence: 90%
U.S. State Department NEGOTIATE Iran, P5+1
"We felt it was useful and necessary to extend the negotiations."
Confidence: 90%
U.S. State Department OPPOSE new sanctions against Tehran
"As long as the joint action is ongoing, no new sanctions [against Tehran] should be imposed."
Confidence: 90%

📰 What Happened

U.S. hopes for comprehensive Iran nuclear agreement by March, avoiding new sanctions during negotiations.

  • U.S. State Department announce Iran, P5+1
  • U.S. State Department negotiate Iran, P5+1
  • U.S. State Department oppose new sanctions against Tehran

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Because Iran seeks to legitimize its nuclear program and reduce sanctions.
🌍 Regional: Because a comprehensive agreement could stabilize regional tensions.
🌐 International: Because it impacts global non-proliferation efforts and U.S.-Iran relations.

📚 Background

The U.S. aims for a significant nuclear agreement with Iran by March 31, avoiding new sanctions.

📝 Key Evidence

"We hope to reach a comprehensive agreement with Tehran by March 31."
→ This indicates U.S. diplomatic efforts regarding Iran's nuclear program.
"As long as the joint action is ongoing, no new sanctions [against Tehran] should be imposed."
→ This shows the U.S. stance on sanctions during negotiations.
📡 Source: INTERNATIONAL
📊 Confidence: 80%
Radio Farda is known for its critical stance on the Iranian government.

Jen Psaki, the spokesperson for the U.S. State Department, emphasized the U.S. government's unwillingness to impose new sanctions during the ongoing 'joint action' between Iran and the P5+1. She expressed hope that the parties would reach an agreement for a comprehensive action by the end of March, after which experts could finalize the details. The State Department spokesperson stated that Secretary of State John Kerry is in close contact with members of the U.S. Congress following his return from nuclear negotiations in Vienna. According to Ms. Psaki, the State Department's clear request is that 'just as we have asked Iran to comply with its commitments under the joint action agreement (suspension of certain nuclear activities in exchange for some sanctions), we must do the same. This means that as long as the joint action is ongoing, no new sanctions [against Tehran] should be imposed.' In response to the question regarding the expiration of the joint action (on November 24), she stated that the extension of negotiations was a mutual agreement. This U.S. official remarked, 'We felt it was useful and necessary to extend the negotiations.' Jen Psaki also added that the United States hopes to reach a comprehensive agreement with Tehran by March 31 that 'will assure the world of the peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear program.' After that, experts can continue their work on the details and finalize them. Thus, the U.S. State Department spokesperson described the upcoming actions as a 'two-phase effort.' Iran and the P5+1 group decided to extend the nuclear negotiations until June 2015 after the expiration of the extended deadline on November 24. Nevertheless, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif emphasized that the goal is to reach a political agreement in the 'shortest time' within 'four months' (by March). He stated that after reaching a 'political understanding' as soon as possible, they could move towards 'drafting' it 'as a technical and political package.' The U.S. State Department spokesperson's remarks about opposing sanctions while the 'joint action' is ongoing come after reports of efforts in Congress to increase sanctions. The Associated Press recently reported that the American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), a powerful pro-Israel lobby, is attempting to increase U.S. sanctions against Tehran following the extension of nuclear negotiations between Iran and the six negotiating countries in the P5+1. This pro-Israel lobby mentioned in a statement published a week ago, which was quoted by the Jewish News Network (JTA), that 'it is now essential for Congress to pass new sanctions laws with bipartisan cooperation so that Tehran knows it will face more pressure if it does not clearly abandon its military nuclear program.' Iran has always emphasized that its nuclear program is conducted solely for peaceful purposes. However, the West views this with skepticism. Due to Tehran's non-compliance with the demands of the United Nations Security Council, Iran faces international sanctions, as well as separate sanctions from the U.S. and its allies. Republican members of the U.S. Senate, a part of Congress currently dominated by Democrats, faced defeat on November 13 in their attempt to pass a plan to impose more sanctions on Iran in the event of a failure in nuclear negotiations. Power in the U.S. Senate has been held by Republicans since 2015.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →