The UN General Assembly has discussed a resolution calling for Israel to comply with a ruling from the International Court, which deems the security barrier in the West Bank illegal and states that it must be dismantled. During discussions on Friday, Nasser al-Qidwa, the Palestinian representative, stated that any part of the wall built in occupied Palestinian territory should be removed. The Israeli ambassador argued that the issue separating Israelis and Palestinians is terrorism, not a wall. The resolution has been proposed by Arab countries and members of the Non-Aligned Movement and is likely to pass. However, it is not expected to be voted on until at least Monday. The US ambassador stated that the United States would vote against the resolution.
UN General Assembly Meeting to Force Israel to Dismantle Security Barrier - 2004-07-17
The UN General Assembly is considering a resolution demanding Israel dismantle its security barrier in the West Bank, following an International Court ruling. Palestinian representative Nasser al-Qidwa insists all parts of the wall in occupied territory must be removed, while the Israeli ambassador attributes the conflict to terrorism. The resolution, backed by Arab nations, is expected to pass but faces opposition from the US.
👥 Key Players
📰 What Happened
The UN General Assembly is discussing a resolution that demands Israel dismantle its security barrier in the West Bank, following a ruling from the International Court deeming it illegal. The resolution is backed by Arab nations and members of the Non-Aligned Movement but faces opposition from the US.
- The International Court ruled that the security barrier in the West Bank is illegal.
- The resolution is expected to pass but will be voted on later.
💡 Why It Matters
📚 Background
The Israeli security barrier, built during the Second Intifada, is a contentious issue, with Palestinians viewing it as a land grab and Israel citing security concerns.
🏷️ Entities Mentioned
Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →
Translation confidence: 85%