Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

United States Says It May Publicize New UN Resolution on Use of Force Against Iraq This Week - 2003-02-19

Feb 11, 2026 February 11, 2026 2 min read 📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway

The U.S. may announce a new UN resolution this week allowing military action against Iraq, justified by Saddam Hussein's non-compliance with disarmament. While the U.S. and UK support this action, key Security Council members like Germany, France, and Russia oppose it. A former Iraqi scientist claims Iraq still has hidden chemical and biological weapons.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The U.S. is moving towards military action against Iraq, raising significant international tensions and opposition from key global players.

👥 Key Players

Ari Fleischer MENTIONED
White House spokesperson
"His statements reflect the U.S. government's position on military action against Iraq, influencing international perceptions."
Tony Blair MENTIONED
British Prime Minister
"As a key ally of the U.S., his support for military action adds legitimacy to the U.S. stance and impacts coalition dynamics."
Saddam Hussein MENTIONED
President of Iraq
"His actions and policies regarding weapons disarmament are central to the justification for potential military intervention."
Hussein al-Shahristani MENTIONED
Former Iraqi scientist
"His claims about Iraq's hidden weapons provide critical evidence that may sway international opinion towards supporting military action."
UN Security Council members (Germany, France, Russia) MENTIONED
Opponents of military action
"Their opposition highlights the divisions within the international community regarding the use of force against Iraq."

📰 What Happened

The U.S. announced it might publicize a new UN resolution this week that could authorize military action against Iraq, citing Saddam Hussein's non-compliance with disarmament. Key Security Council members oppose this resolution, while a former Iraqi scientist claims Iraq still possesses banned weapons.

  • The U.S. and UK are pushing for a resolution to justify military action against Iraq.
  • Most Security Council members, including Germany, France, and Russia, are against the war.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Iran views U.S. military actions in the region with concern, fearing it could lead to increased U.S. influence and potential threats to its own security.
🌍 Regional: The resolution and potential military action could destabilize the Middle East further, impacting regional security dynamics.
🌐 International: This situation underscores the tensions between the U.S. and its allies versus those opposed to military intervention, affecting global diplomatic relations.

📚 Background

The U.S. and its allies have accused Iraq of possessing weapons of mass destruction, leading to calls for military intervention, while many countries advocate for continued diplomatic solutions.

Iraq War UN Security Council Resolutions
📡 Source: INTERNATIONAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
This article reflects the perspectives of U.S. officials and may emphasize their viewpoints while downplaying opposition perspectives.

The United States says it may publicize a new United Nations resolution regarding the legality of using force against Iraq this week. These remarks were made today by Ari Fleischer, the White House spokesperson, as the UN Security Council began a two-day meeting to discuss the Iraq crisis. On Monday, the ambassadors of Britain and the United States met to discuss the timing and content of the new resolution. British Prime Minister Tony Blair states that Saddam Hussein's refusal to comply with UN disarmament resolutions justifies military action against Iraq. However, most members of the Security Council, led by Germany, France, and Russia, oppose war. Meanwhile, a former Iraqi scientist claims that he believes Iraq still possesses chemical and biological weapons. Hussein al-Shahristani, senior scientific advisor to the Iraqi Atomic Energy Commission, said in an interview with reporters in the Philippines today that Iraq has dismantled its nuclear weapons but has hidden its chemical and biological weapons underground to evade the eyes of weapons inspectors. Mr. al-Shahristani, who spent over ten years in prison for refusing to produce prohibited weapons in Iraq, fled the country in 1991. He claims to have obtained his information from former colleagues and dissidents who have escaped from Iraq.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →