Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

US: An Early Ceasefire at This Stage Means Hamas's Survival and Repetition of Attacks Similar to October 7 Against Israel

Feb 5, 2026 February 5, 2026 2 min read 📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway

The US has rejected an early ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas conflict, arguing it would allow Hamas to survive and regroup. Matthew Miller emphasized the need for Hamas's overthrow for sustainable peace, while Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu stated the war will continue until Hamas is defeated. This stance highlights the US's commitment to Israel's military objectives.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The US opposes an early ceasefire, aligning with Israel's military objectives against Hamas.

👥 Key Players

Matthew Miller MENTIONED
US State Department Spokesperson
"Represents the US government's official stance on international conflicts, including the Israel-Hamas situation."
Benjamin Netanyahu MENTIONED
Prime Minister of Israel
"Leader of Israel, directly involved in the decision-making process regarding military actions against Hamas."
Hamas MENTIONED
Palestinian militant organization
"Central party in the conflict with Israel, controlling the Gaza Strip and involved in the October 7 attacks."

📰 What Happened

The US has opposed a UN resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas conflict, arguing it would allow Hamas to regroup and continue attacks. The US emphasizes the need for Hamas's overthrow for sustainable peace.

  • The US voted against a UN draft resolution for an immediate ceasefire.
  • The resolution aimed to stop Palestinian civilian casualties and facilitate humanitarian aid.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Iran supports Hamas and any action against Hamas could impact Iran's influence in the region.
🌍 Regional: The conflict affects regional stability, with potential repercussions for neighboring countries and alliances.
🌐 International: The US's stance reflects its commitment to Israel and influences international diplomatic dynamics.

📚 Background

The Israel-Hamas conflict has been ongoing for decades, with periodic escalations leading to international diplomatic interventions.

Israel-Palestine conflict US foreign policy in the Middle East
📡 Source: INTERNATIONAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The information is from a US government spokesperson, reflecting official US policy and perspective.

Matthew Miller, spokesperson for the US State Department, said at a press conference on Wednesday that an early ceasefire at this stage would mean the survival of Hamas, the preservation of its weapons and military infrastructure, and the repetition of attacks similar to those on October 7 against Israel. Miller added, "The approval of this UN resolution shows that other countries also agree with the US that the war must end, but now is not the time." On Tuesday, the US voted against a draft resolution in the UN General Assembly that called for an immediate ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas war. Miller continued that the October 7 attack should wake the world from its slumber, as the continued rule of Hamas in Gaza is not in anyone's interest. The draft resolution, which is non-binding, was approved with 153 votes in favor, 10 against, and 23 abstentions. The aim of this resolution was to stop the killing of Palestinian civilians and to facilitate the delivery of humanitarian aid to Gaza. According to Miller, sustainable peace in the region requires the overthrow of Hamas and the transfer of power in Gaza to a group that represents all Palestinians. He described this change as a basis for establishing an independent state for Palestinians. Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in his speech to Israeli soldiers, stated that there is international pressure to end the war, but the battle will continue until Hamas is destroyed.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →