Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

US: Potential Attack on Iraq to Begin with Extensive Airstrikes Against Military and Political Targets - 2003-02-02

Feb 11, 2026 February 11, 2026 1 min read 📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway

US defense officials announced that a potential military attack on Iraq will commence with extensive airstrikes aimed at military and political targets. The US is pressuring Saddam Hussein to comply with UN weapons demands, while Iraq denies having any prohibited weapons. This situation is critical as it escalates tensions in the region and could lead to significant military action.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The US's planned military action against Iraq marks a significant escalation in regional tensions and has far-reaching implications for Iran and the broader Middle East.

👥 Key Players

Saddam Hussein MENTIONED
President of Iraq
"Saddam's leadership and policies directly impact regional stability and US-Iran relations."
Colin Powell MENTIONED
US Secretary of State
"As a key US official, Powell's actions and statements influence international perceptions and diplomatic efforts regarding Iraq."
US Military MENTIONED
Armed forces of the United States
"Their operational decisions can alter the balance of power in the Middle East and affect Iran's strategic calculations."

📰 What Happened

US defense officials announced plans for a military attack on Iraq, starting with extensive airstrikes against military and political targets. The goal is to weaken Iraq's military capabilities and pressure Saddam Hussein to comply with UN demands regarding weapons of mass destruction.

  • The US plans to launch over 3,000 guided missiles and bombs in the first 48 hours of the attack.
  • The US aims to minimize civilian casualties and facilitate rapid reconstruction post-conflict.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Iran views US military actions in Iraq as a direct threat, potentially leading to increased tensions and military posturing in the region.
🌍 Regional: The attack could destabilize the entire Middle East, affecting neighboring countries and potentially leading to wider conflict.
🌐 International: Western nations are closely monitoring the situation, as it could reshape alliances and influence global security policies.

📚 Background

The US has accused Iraq of possessing weapons of mass destruction, which Iraq denies. This situation is part of a larger context of post-9/11 US foreign policy aimed at combating perceived threats in the Middle East.

US-Iran relations Middle Eastern geopolitics
📡 Source: INTERNATIONAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The article reflects US defense officials' perspectives, which may emphasize military readiness and justification for intervention.

US defense officials state that a potential attack on Iraq will begin with extensive airstrikes against military and political targets to facilitate subsequent ground advances. These officials indicate that the US military will launch over three thousand guided missiles and bombs in the first forty-eight hours of the attack to incapacitate the Iraqi army and diminish its will to fight. American officials emphasize that the aim of such operations is to minimize civilian casualties and prevent significant damage to Iraq's infrastructure, allowing for rapid reconstruction after the war. The US has pressured Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein to either relinquish power or fully comply with UN demands to dismantle prohibited weapons. Iraq claims it has no programs for chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons. US Secretary of State Colin Powell is scheduled to present evidence to the United Nations on Wednesday that, according to American officials, will contradict Iraq's statements. The US and Britain have been reinforcing their forces in the Gulf region for months, and it is expected that more than 150,000 soldiers will be ready for an attack on Iraq by mid-month.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →