Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
🔴 Breaking ❓ Unknown

US Treasury Secretary Warns Against Unilateral Withdrawal from Iran Agreement

Jul 14, 2026 July 14, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

US Treasury Secretary Jack Lew warned that a unilateral withdrawal from the nuclear agreement with Iran would destabilize international relations and undermine US credibility in enforcing sanctions. He emphasized that without the possibility of lifting sanctions, countries would be less likely to change their policies. This situation is critical as it affects US-Iran relations and broader geopolitical stability.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: Unilateral withdrawal from the Iran agreement could lead to increased instability.

👥 Key Players

Jack Lew QUOTED
US Treasury Secretary
""If you are sitting in Tehran right now, you do not necessarily feel that you have much relief (from sanctions).""
Hassan Rouhani (حسن روحانی) ACTOR
President of Iran
"After months of negotiations between the officials of Hassan Rouhani's government..."
Ted Cruz QUOTED
Republican Senator
"Republican Senator Ted Cruz... referred to the nuclear agreement with Iran as a 'bad deal'."
Donald Trump QUOTED
Former President of the United States
"Billionaire Donald Trump... stated that they would abandon it if elected president."
Iran (ایران) TARGET
Country
"Iran denies the accusation of supporting terrorism."
United States (ایالات متحده) ACTOR
Country
"The United States has lifted nuclear sanctions on Iran."

⚡ Actions

Jack Lew ANNOUNCE Iran nuclear agreement
""If you reach an agreement that is based on: change your policy to be freed from sanctions; then there must also be a way to lift the penalties.""
Confidence: 90%
Jack Lew WARN Republicans, US credibility
""Such an action would be destabilizing and dangerous.""
Confidence: 90%
Iran and P5+1 NEGOTIATE nuclear program
"After months of negotiations between the officials of Hassan Rouhani's government and the P5+1, Iran and six global powers reached an agreement."
Confidence: 80%

📰 What Happened

US Treasury Secretary warns against unilateral withdrawal from Iran nuclear agreement.

  • Jack Lew announce Iran nuclear agreement
  • Jack Lew warn Republicans, US credibility
  • Iran and P5+1 negotiate nuclear program

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Because the lifting of sanctions is crucial for Iran's economy.
🌍 Regional: Because changes in US policy could destabilize the Middle East.
🌐 International: Because the US credibility in sanctioning other nations is at stake.

📚 Background

Unilateral withdrawal from the Iran agreement could lead to increased instability.

📝 Key Evidence

""If you reach an agreement that is based on: change your policy to be freed from sanctions; then there must also be a way to lift the penalties.""
→ Indicates the importance of lifting sanctions for policy change.
""Such an action would be destabilizing and dangerous.""
→ Warns against the potential consequences of withdrawing from the agreement.
📡 Source: NEUTRAL
📊 Confidence: 80%
Radio Farda is generally considered a reliable source for news on Iran.

In a television interview, US Treasury Secretary Jack Lew referred to the lifting of sanctions on Iran and the threats from Republicans regarding the dismantling of the nuclear agreement, stating that such an action would be "destabilizing and dangerous." In a conversation with Charlie Rose on April 10, he mentioned that if there is no possibility of lifting economic sanctions against governments, no country will be willing to change its policies. He warned that the failure of the US to respond to the agreement made with Iran would mean losing Washington's credibility for sanctioning others and forcing them to change their behavior. After months of negotiations between the officials of Hassan Rouhani's government and the P5+1, Iran and six global powers reached an agreement that limits the nuclear program and ends nuclear sanctions against Iran. According to Reuters, Lew stated, "If you reach an agreement that is based on: change your policy to be freed from sanctions; then there must also be a way to lift the penalties." He added that if this does not happen, "no one will change their policy in response to the imposition of sanctions." Republican Senator Ted Cruz and billionaire Donald Trump have referred to the nuclear agreement with Iran as a "bad deal" that "endangers the security of the US and Israel," stating that they would abandon it if elected president. Lew, who played a key role in establishing the extensive sanctions structure against Iran during Barack Obama's presidency, said such a move would lead to "instability" and could be "dangerous." According to the New York Times, Lew also pointed to the problems arising from lifting nuclear sanctions while maintaining other sanctions related to "support for terrorism" or human rights issues in Iran. The newspaper quoted the US Treasury Secretary as saying, "If you are sitting in Tehran right now, you do not necessarily feel that you have much relief (from sanctions)." The United States has lifted nuclear sanctions on Iran, but other sanctions remain in place. Iran denies the accusation of supporting terrorism. The US Treasury Secretary emphasized that the impact of sanctions is greater the more international support they gain and are applied in cooperation with other countries. He stated that sanctions should not be viewed as a weapon for "punishing past actions," but as a means to change policies. This Obama administration official noted that on one hand, "one cannot dismiss the idea that imposing sanctions weakens economic growth," but on the other hand, he added that "sanctions should not be used frivolously." Reuters reported that the US government has used sanctions over the years to counter various threats to its interests, from cyberattacks to financial support for extremist groups or drug trafficking.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →