Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
🔴 Breaking ❓ Unknown

USA: Released Iranian Funds Can Only Be Used for Non-Sanctioned Items; Users: 'It's Shameful'

Jun 27, 2026 June 27, 2026 2 min read 📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway

The U.S. has released six billion dollars of Iran's blocked funds in exchange for five Iranian-American prisoners, leading to widespread criticism on social media. Critics compare the deal to Saddam's 'Oil for Food' program, highlighting the perceived humiliation and ineffectiveness of Iran's current diplomatic efforts. This situation underscores the complex dynamics of hostage diplomacy and international relations involving Iran.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The release of funds is seen as a double-edged sword for Iran, balancing humanitarian needs against political leverage.

👥 Key Players

Antony Blinken QUOTED
U.S. Secretary of State
"Iran can only use the released funds for humanitarian purposes."
Mostafa Faghihi (مصطفی فقیهی) QUOTED
Journalist
"Described the recent diplomacy of Ebrahim Raisi's government as 'begging diplomacy'."
Abdolnaser Hemmati (عبدالناصر همتی) QUOTED
Former head of the Central Bank
"Accused Ebrahim Raisi's government of returning to square one."
Ebrahim Raisi (ابراهیم رئیسی) ACCUSED
President of Iran
"Described the recent diplomacy of Ebrahim Raisi's government as 'begging diplomacy'."
Maryam Jamshidi (مریم جمشیدی) QUOTED
Sociologist and university professor
"Attributed the one billion dollar loss to the 'inept government's' delay."
Abbas Abdi (عباس عبدی) QUOTED
Social researcher and media activist
"Pointed out the psychological and political repercussions of such a 'damaging' deal."

⚡ Actions

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken ANNOUNCE Iran
"Iran can only use the released funds for humanitarian purposes."
Confidence: 90%
Mostafa Faghihi ACCUSE Ebrahim Raisi's government
"Described the recent diplomacy of Ebrahim Raisi's government as 'begging diplomacy' and 'hanging diplomacy'."
Confidence: 80%
Abdolnaser Hemmati CRITICIZE Ebrahim Raisi's government
"Accused Ebrahim Raisi's government of returning to square one after 'three years of imposed costs.'"
Confidence: 80%

📰 What Happened

The U.S. released $6 billion of Iran's funds for humanitarian use amid criticism and concerns over hostage diplomacy.

  • U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken announce Iran
  • Mostafa Faghihi accuse Ebrahim Raisi's government
  • Abdolnaser Hemmati criticize Ebrahim Raisi's government

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Because it highlights the government's reliance on hostage diplomacy and humanitarian aid.
🌍 Regional: Because it raises concerns about Iran's use of leverage in international negotiations.
🌐 International: Because it reflects ongoing tensions between the U.S. and Iran over sanctions and human rights.

📚 Background

The release of funds is seen as a double-edged sword for Iran, balancing humanitarian needs against political leverage.

📝 Key Evidence

"Iran can only use the released funds for humanitarian purposes."
→ U.S. government's position on the use of released funds.
"Described the recent diplomacy of Ebrahim Raisi's government as 'begging diplomacy'."
→ Criticism of Iran's diplomatic approach.
📡 Source: INTERNATIONAL
📊 Confidence: 80%
VOA Persian is generally considered a reliable source for news on Iran.

The news of the release of six billion dollars of Iran's blocked funds in South Korea in exchange for the freedom of five Iranian-American prisoners in Iran has sparked various reactions among social media users. While U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken stated that Iran can only use the released funds for humanitarian purposes, some users have compared this exchange to Saddam's 'Oil for Food' program, deeming it humiliating. Mostafa Faghihi, a journalist and owner of the news site 'Entekhab', described the recent diplomacy of Ebrahim Raisi's government as 'begging diplomacy' and 'hanging diplomacy', stating: 'truly, a hundred blessings to Saddam's Oil for Food program.' Abdolnaser Hemmati, former head of the Central Bank, accused Ebrahim Raisi's government of returning to square one after 'three years of imposed costs.' A user named Seyed Sadegh Hosseini referred to the repeated news of the release of Iran's blocked funds in South Korea over the past months, calling 'Oil for Food' shameful. Maryam Jamshidi, a sociologist and university professor, attributed the one billion dollar loss and the conversion of seven billion dollars of Iran's money to six billion dollars in South Korea to the 'inept government's' delay. Although Abbas Abdi, a social researcher and media activist, emphasized the Iranian nationality of the five prisoners, he pointed out the psychological and political repercussions of such a 'damaging' deal. Observers of Iranian affairs say that the Islamic Republic aims to use the detention of citizens from other countries, especially dual nationals, as leverage in its negotiations with other countries, effectively taking them hostage with false accusations. Meanwhile, Antony Blinken reiterated on Thursday that the Islamic Republic would receive no 'relief from sanctions' in exchange for the release of the five dual-national prisoners. The widespread reaction to the agreement between the U.S. and the Islamic Republic for the release of hostages has been noted in global media, with users reacting to the potential release of dual-national hostages, describing it as the Islamic Republic's policy of piracy. Shahin Modarres stated that the Islamic Republic uses the ransom money for repression programs. The European Union has expressed its support for the change in the status of Iranian-American prisoners.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →