Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Vaezi: The Ministry of Intelligence and the system have the right to sue Ismail Bakhtiari

Jan 25, 2026 January 25, 2026 4 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

Mahmoud Vaezi announced that the Iranian Ministry of Intelligence has the right to sue Ismail Bakhtiari, a workers' representative, over his claims of torture. The Minister of Intelligence denied the allegations, while Bakhtiari's lawyer criticized the handling of the case. This situation highlights ongoing tensions regarding human rights and government accountability in Iran.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The Iranian government's response to Bakhtiari's allegations reflects broader issues of human rights and state accountability in the country.

👥 Key Players

Mahmoud Vaezi MENTIONED
Head of the Iranian President's office
"Vaezi represents the executive branch and is involved in addressing allegations against the government, reflecting the official stance on human rights issues."
Ismail Bakhtiari MENTIONED
Representative of Haft Tappeh sugarcane workers
"Bakhtiari is a key figure advocating for workers' rights and has raised serious allegations of torture, highlighting issues of government accountability."
Mahmoud Alavi MENTIONED
Minister of Intelligence
"Alavi oversees intelligence operations and is directly involved in the investigation of Bakhtiari's claims, representing the state's response to allegations of human rights abuses."
Farzaneh Zilabi MENTIONED
Bakhtiari's lawyer
"Zilabi plays a crucial role in defending Bakhtiari and advocating for legal rights, emphasizing the legal and procedural aspects of the case."
Hoshmatollah Fallah-Pisheh MENTIONED
Member of Parliament
"Fallah-Pisheh's comments reflect the legislative body's stance on the issue and its influence on public perception and legal proceedings."

📰 What Happened

Mahmoud Vaezi announced that the Iranian Ministry of Intelligence intends to sue Ismail Bakhtiari for his claims of torture, which the ministry denies. The case is currently under preliminary investigation, and Bakhtiari's lawyer has criticized the handling of the situation.

  • Bakhtiari claims he was tortured during his detention by the Ministry of Intelligence.
  • The investigation into Bakhtiari's claims is ongoing, with a government committee formed to assess the situation.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: This case highlights the struggle for human rights and accountability in Iran, particularly regarding the treatment of dissenters and workers.
🌍 Regional: The situation may influence labor movements and human rights discussions in neighboring countries facing similar issues.
🌐 International: International observers may view this case as indicative of Iran's human rights record, impacting diplomatic relations and potential sanctions.

📚 Background

Iran has a history of labor protests and government crackdowns, with allegations of torture and human rights abuses frequently surfacing in political discourse.

Labor rights in Iran Human rights abuses by the Iranian government
📡 Source: STATE MEDIA
📊 Confidence: 70%
The article reflects the official narrative of the Iranian government, which may downplay allegations of human rights abuses.

Mahmoud Vaezi, the head of the Iranian President's office, announced on Wednesday, January 9, that it has been decided that "this right will be considered for the Ministry of Intelligence and the system" to file a complaint against Ismail Bakhtiari, one of the representatives of the Haft Tappeh sugarcane workers. He stated that following the report from the Minister of Intelligence regarding the investigation of Bakhtiari's claims about his torture in the ministry's detention center, it became clear that this claim was, according to him, "not true at all." This government official announced that the judiciary has been asked to review the Ministry of Intelligence's complaint against Bakhtiari, stating: "It cannot be that some people make claims and the system is questioned." Vaezi's remarks came at a time when the results of the investigations by the committee formed by the government and the judiciary's delegation sent to Shush in Khuzestan province have not yet been announced. According to the Telegram channel Emtehad, Bakhtiari's complaint file is currently in the "preliminary investigation stage," according to his lawyer. Meanwhile, according to ISNA news agency, Laya Janidi, the legal deputy of the Iranian President, pointed out that the committee formed by Hassan Rouhani is "doing its work and will announce its report," adding: "If Bakhtiari's claims are true, the events that occurred are unconstitutional and must be dealt with severely, and if nothing happened or what was claimed is not substantiated, it destroys the greatest asset of any country, which is trust." Janidi called for "patience and endurance to address this issue." In the meantime, Farzaneh Zilabi, Bakhtiari's lawyer, expressed surprise at the statements made by the head of the National Security and Foreign Policy Commission of the Parliament, saying, "Before a verdict is issued, especially in the preliminary investigation stage, from someone who is a member of the country's legislative body, it surprised me." She also considered Hoshmatollah Fallah-Pisheh's reference to Bakhtiari's confession video as a clear example of illegality in the legislative body, adding: "The Parliament should be the voice of the nation, not specific institutions." Fallah-Pisheh had accused Bakhtiari of being affiliated with the Iranian Workers' Communist Party based on a video of Bakhtiari's "confessions." This parliament member claimed that Bakhtiari "confessed in a video to his affiliation with the Workers' Communist Party, but the audio was completely unclear." However, Asghar Karimi, the head of the executive committee of the Workers' Communist Party of Iran, denied these statements, telling Radio Farda: "I explicitly deny Bakhtiari's affiliation with the Workers' Communist Party. He has neither requested membership in the Workers' Communist Party nor is he a member of the party." According to Emtehad, affiliated with the Islamic Iran Nation Alliance Party, Bakhtiari's lawyer criticized the airing of his client's confession video in the National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, adding: "We all know the story of this documentation well, and it should not have been reflected in a case that is in the preliminary investigation stage." Zilabi also considered the presence of Mahmoud Alavi, the Minister of Intelligence, in the National Security and Foreign Policy Commission meeting as "a one-sided approach to the judge" and added that her client had requested to attend the commission meeting, and it would have been good for Fallah-Pisheh to hear his statements as well. In this regard, the independent channel of Haft Tappeh workers reported that Bakhtiari was "prevented" from attending the National Security and Foreign Policy Commission meeting. Reports indicate that the Minister of Intelligence and the ministry's officials referred to Bakhtiari's torture as a claim and denied it during this meeting. Bakhtiari stated that he was tortured during his 25-day detention in the Intelligence Department's detention center and invited the Minister of Intelligence to participate in a live televised debate; this invitation has so far gone unanswered by Mahmoud Alavi. Meanwhile, according to IRNA news agency, Fatemeh Saidi, the spokesperson for the reformist faction in Parliament, known as the Hope faction, stated that members of this faction held separate meetings with the Minister of Intelligence and Bakhtiari regarding his claims. According to ISNA news agency, Saidi announced that "the Hope faction plans to travel to Khuzestan province and Shush city to conduct a final assessment on-site regarding Bakhtiari's claims."

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →