Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی ✈️ Telegram EN فا

ISNA is a semi-official Iranian news agency (Iranian Students News Agency). This is a translation of that outlet's own report; it is the outlet's account, not Artesh's finding. See what Iranian state media is saying today.

❓ Unknown

Video/Haqqiqpour: If National Interests Are Not Achieved Through Negotiation, We Will Fight Until America Fulfills Its Commitments

1w ago October 24, 2026 1 min read 📰 ISNA

📋 Key Takeaway

A principlist political figure emphasized the importance of achieving Iran's national interests through either negotiation or war. He highlighted the Islamabad agreement as a positive outcome, asserting that if negotiations fail, Iran will resort to military action to compel the U.S. to comply with its commitments. This stance underscores the ongoing tensions between Iran and the U.S.

🔍 Quick Context Guide

💡 Bottom Line: Iran's leadership is prepared to escalate tensions with the U.S. if diplomatic negotiations do not yield satisfactory results.

👥 Key Players

Haqqiqpour MENTIONED

Principlist political activist

"Represents hardline views in Iran that prioritize national interests and assertive foreign policy, particularly towards the U.S."

United States MENTIONED

Key adversary in negotiations

"Central to Iran's foreign policy challenges, particularly regarding nuclear agreements and sanctions."

📰 What Happened

A principlist political figure stated that Iran will pursue its national interests through negotiation or military action if necessary. He referenced the Islamabad agreement as a positive outcome and warned that failure to achieve these interests through diplomacy would lead to conflict.

The Islamabad agreement is viewed positively by Iranian hardliners.
The statement reflects ongoing tensions between Iran and the U.S. regarding compliance with agreements.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: This stance reinforces the hardline approach within Iran's political landscape, potentially impacting domestic support for negotiations.

🌍 Regional: The statement could escalate regional tensions, especially if military action is pursued.

🌐 International: It signals to the international community that Iran is willing to resort to conflict if diplomatic efforts fail, complicating relations with the U.S. and its allies.

📚 Background

Iran has a long history of contentious relations with the U.S., particularly over nuclear development and sanctions. The Islamabad agreement refers to a diplomatic effort that is seen as a step forward by hardliners.

Iran nuclear deal U.S.-Iran relations

📡 Source: STATE MEDIA

📊 Confidence: 70%

As a principlist figure, Haqqiqpour's views may reflect the official stance of hardline factions within the Iranian government, which can influence public opinion and policy.

A principlist political activist posed the question of what the goal of war and negotiation is, stating: If we are fighting or negotiating, it is to achieve the maximum national interests of Iran. The Islamabad agreement was very good; now, if this achievement is not obtained through negotiation, we will fight to ensure that the American side implements these achievements.