Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
🔴 Breaking ❓ Unknown

Where Iran stands on the memorandum it signed with the U.S

Jul 6, 2026 July 6, 2026 5 min read 📰 WWNO
📋 Key Takeaway

Sanam Vakil of Chatham House discusses Iran's perspective on the memorandum of understanding with the US, noting that the Iranian system feels bolstered after surviving the war and sees the talks as an opportunity for sanctions relief. She highlights the deep mistrust of the Trump administration within Iran due to multiple attacks during negotiations, and the public's relief that the war is over, though with little confidence in a lasting deal.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The outcome of these talks could determine Iran's future economic and political landscape.

👥 Key Players

Sanam Vakil QUOTED
Director of the Middle East and North Africa Programme at Chatham House
"The talks and the memorandum of understanding offer Iran sanctions relief."
JD Vance QUOTED
Vice President
"We have all the cards in negotiation."
Iranian regime (نظام ایران) TARGET
Government of Iran
"The Iranian system... survived the war, came out feeling quite bolstered."
Trump administration ACTOR
U.S. Government
"The Trump administration feels about the memorandum of understanding."
ordinary Iranians AFFECTED
Citizens of Iran
"For ordinary Iranians, it's been a very extraordinary and tough number of months."
new supreme leader QUOTED
Supreme Leader of Iran
"There is a new supreme leader. He hasn't been seen."

⚡ Actions

Iran and the U.S. NEGOTIATE Iranian regime, Trump administration
"The next round of talks between Iran and the U.S. might take place in a few days."
Confidence: 80%
Trump administration ANNOUNCE Iran
"They’re saying it's all good."
Confidence: 70%
ordinary Iranians PROTEST Iranian government
"There were protests in January that were just violently suppressed."
Confidence: 90%

📰 What Happened

Iran and the U.S. prepare for talks following a memorandum of understanding amid internal and external pressures.

  • Iran and the U.S. negotiate Iranian regime, Trump administration
  • Trump administration announce Iran
  • ordinary Iranians protest Iranian government

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Because the memorandum offers potential sanctions relief and a chance for a more stable future.
🌍 Regional: Because it could influence the balance of power and stability in the Middle East.
🌐 International: Because it affects U.S.-Iran relations and broader international nuclear non-proliferation efforts.

📚 Background

The outcome of these talks could determine Iran's future economic and political landscape.

📝 Key Evidence

"The talks and the memorandum of understanding offer Iran sanctions relief."
→ Iran is seeking sanctions relief through negotiations.
📡 Source: NEUTRAL
📊 Confidence: 80%
NPR is generally considered a reliable source of news.

Where Iran stands on the memorandum it signed with the U.S

NPR | By Ayesha Rascoe

Published July 5, 2026 at 7:04 AM CDT

Facebook

Twitter

LinkedIn

Email

Listen • 5:27

AYESHA RASCOE, HOST:

The next round of talks between Iran and the U.S. might take place in a few days after that nearly weeklong funeral held for the country's previous supreme leader wraps up. We've been hearing a lot about how the Trump administration feels about the memorandum of understanding it signed with Iran and how those talks are going, and they're saying it's all good. Here's Vice President JD Vance on "Fox News" on Tuesday.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

JD VANCE: We have all the cards in negotiation. We obviously want it to be successful. But even if it's not successful, we've accomplished the core mission, which is to ensure that the Iranians never have a nuclear weapon. In other words, it's a win-win outcome for the American people.

RASCOE: So how does Iran see things? Sanam Vakil is director of the Middle East and North Africa Programme at Chatham House, a London-based policy institute, and she joins us now. Thank you for being here.

SANAM VAKIL: Thank you for having me.

RASCOE: So how is this memorandum and the talks - I mean, you know, such as they are - being seen by Iran?

VAKIL: Well, the Iranian system - oftentimes referred to as the regime - survived the war, came out feeling quite bolstered. And the talks and the memorandum of understanding offer Iran sanctions relief and an opportunity to negotiate a more permanent deal with the Trump administration.

For ordinary Iranians, it's been a very extraordinary and tough number of months. There were protests in January that were just violently suppressed. We still don't have accurate reporting on how many people were murdered.

And then, of course, there was the war, which created so much anxiety and continues to pass on huge amount of economic pain. I think people are relieved that the war is over for now. There's just not a huge amount of confidence that a deal will be seen at the end of this.

RASCOE: So that's the public, but how about within the Iranian government? Are there skeptics about negotiating with the Trump administration?

VAKIL: Yes, of course. This is a system that isn't currently being represented by one clear individual. There is a new supreme leader. He hasn't been seen. It is unlikely that he will be seen over the course of these funeral processions in the coming days. The system is divided in terms of the direction of travel. There is support for the negotiations, but there is a lot of mistrust of the Trump administration. The Iranians have been attacked multiple times while negotiating with the Trump administration. So I think while they are pursuing negotiations, they're also perhaps preparing for what could be another round of conflict.

RASCOE: Well, I mean, with that level of distrust, how - like, how much would a deal mean, or how do you reach a meaningful deal? Because as you said, would Iran even trust the U.S. and Israel to stick to the terms?

VAKIL: Yeah. That's a good question. I think they're going to give these negotiations a good run. They're supposed to be concluded within 60 days or a 30-day extension. I imagine that it'll be extended beyond that because they are discussing some very difficult issues from the nuclear program to reopening the Strait of Hormuz for safe passage and sanctions relief. But if they don't get that deal, they might get something a bit smaller or a bit more short term. This is all going to be just transactional and buying time, and it's not going to solve the underlying issues. Getting a proper deal will require dedicated negotiations over many months.

RASCOE: Well, as someone who is watching this situation very closely, what are you looking for in terms of signs that things are progressing, or whether there - or whether things are regressing?

VAKIL: Well, I'm looking for continued volatility and conflict in the Strait of Hormuz or in Lebanon, which is also part of the negotiations. That volatility and lobbing, you know, strikes back and forth is a obvious negative sign. And continuation of negotiations is an important, constructive signal. There's reportedly going to be another round of negotiations after the funeral ends next week, but, you know, that could be delayed. The longer the negotiation process drags out is problematic. And those negotiations need to be sustained. They need to be just locked in a room until this is resolved.

RASCOE: That's Sanam Vakil, director of the Middle East and North Africa Programme at Chatham House. Thank you so much for speaking with us today.

VAKIL: Thank you.

(SOUNDBITE OF ALEX MOUKALA II'S "BEANEATH THE MASK (FROM PERSONA 5) [LOFI HIP-HOP REMIX]") Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 100%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →