Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
🔴 Breaking ❓ Unknown

Whistleblowers Claim Billions in Financial Transactions Between Standard Chartered Bank and Iran

Apr 26, 2026 April 26, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

Whistleblowers allege that Standard Chartered Bank engaged in billions of dollars in secret transactions with Iranian entities and terrorist organizations, despite claiming to have ceased all business with Iran. The allegations raise significant concerns about the bank's compliance with U.S. sanctions and could lead to severe legal and financial repercussions for the bank.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: Allegations against Standard Chartered could lead to significant legal and reputational consequences.

👥 Key Players

Julian Knight QUOTED
Former global head of foreign exchange transactions
"Julian Knight... accused the U.S. government of failing to pursue these violations."
Robert Marselios QUOTED
Currency trader
"Robert Marselios... state that these transactions occurred while the bank had previously announced it had halted all business relations."
David Skenteling QUOTED
Crime analyst
"David Skenteling... discovered over half a million separate transactions between 2008 and 2013 that were skillfully concealed."
Standard Chartered Bank ACCUSED
Bank
"Standard Chartered is one of the largest banks in the UK and has previously been fined for similar allegations."

⚡ Actions

Standard Chartered Bank VIOLATE U.S. sanctions
"These transactions constitute a clear violation of U.S. sanctions against Iran and terrorist groups."
Confidence: 90%
U.S. government IGNORE evidence of transactions
"Julian Knight... accused the U.S. government of failing to pursue these violations despite the evidence presented."
Confidence: 80%
Standard Chartered Bank CONDUCT Iranian entities, terrorist organizations
"$9.6 billion in foreign exchange transactions with individuals and companies designated by the U.S. government."
Confidence: 90%

📰 What Happened

Whistleblowers allege Standard Chartered Bank conducted billions in transactions with Iranian entities and terrorists.

  • Standard Chartered Bank violate U.S. sanctions
  • U.S. government ignore evidence of transactions
  • Standard Chartered Bank conduct Iranian entities, terrorist organizations

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Because it highlights potential financial support for Iranian entities and terrorist organizations.
🌍 Regional: Because it raises concerns about the financing of terrorism in the Middle East.
🌐 International: Because it could lead to increased scrutiny of financial institutions dealing with Iran.

📚 Background

Allegations against Standard Chartered could lead to significant legal and reputational consequences.

📝 Key Evidence

"These transactions constitute a clear violation of U.S. sanctions against Iran and terrorist groups."
→ Violation of U.S. sanctions.
"Julian Knight... accused the U.S. government of failing to pursue these violations despite the evidence presented."
→ U.S. government inaction.
📡 Source: INDEPENDENT
📊 Confidence: 80%
Radio Farda is known for reporting on issues related to Iran, often highlighting government misconduct.

According to documents recently submitted to a court in New York, two whistleblowers claim that the British bank Standard Chartered secretly conducted billions of dollars in transactions with Iranian entities and terrorist organizations. Standard Chartered is one of the largest banks in the UK and has previously been fined for similar allegations. The two whistleblowers, Julian Knight, former global head of foreign exchange transactions at Standard Chartered who left the bank in 2011, and Robert Marselios, a currency trader, state that these transactions occurred while the bank had previously announced it had halted all business relations with the Islamic Republic. The alleged transactions include $9.6 billion in foreign exchange transactions with individuals and companies designated by the U.S. government as financiers of terrorist groups, including sanctioned companies and terrorist organizations such as Hezbollah, Hamas, Al-Qaeda, and the Taliban. Additionally, there are foreign exchange transactions related to the Islamic Republic valued at a nominal $100 billion. According to the whistleblowers, these transactions were hidden in extensive confidential banking documents and were first presented to U.S. authorities in 2012. The whistleblowers claim that U.S. officials initially ignored this evidence and even denied its existence in court. David Skenteling, a crime analyst, has stated that he discovered over half a million separate transactions between 2008 and 2013 that were skillfully concealed. He noted that these transactions included dealings with Iranian banks and companies, Middle Eastern exchange houses, and even shell companies linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Hamas, and Hezbollah. These transactions constitute a clear violation of U.S. sanctions against Iran and terrorist groups. Skenteling indicated that Standard Chartered not only continued to provide services to existing Iranian clients but also attracted new clients and developed new business opportunities in Iran. Julian Knight, one of the whistleblowers, accused the U.S. government of failing to pursue these violations despite the evidence presented by him and other whistleblowers, calling this inaction a 'massive fraud.' Standard Chartered has denied these allegations, labeling them as 'fabricated claims' and stating that previous claims by whistleblowers were 'completely discredited' by U.S. authorities. However, the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation have declined to comment on this case. This is not the first time Standard Chartered has been accused of violating sanctions; the bank has paid fines totaling $1.7 billion in 2012 and 2019 for violating sanctions against Iran and other countries. Nevertheless, the bank has never admitted to conducting transactions for terrorist organizations. If the allegations against Standard Chartered are proven, the bank could face heavy fines and even legal action, which could seriously damage its reputation and affect its relations with Western governments.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →