Mohammad Javad Zarif or Qassem Soleimani; which one has more power and influence in foreign policy today? Although Zarif's controversial resignation and subsequent return to the Foreign Ministry faced opposition from Hassan Rouhani, and despite the Quds Force commander's implicit support for him, the reality remains that Soleimani was in Tehran alongside Bashar al-Assad, while Zarif was unaware of his presence. The publication of the quote that, according to Hassan Rouhani, 'Iran only has one foreign minister,' not only did not dampen speculation about the existence of a 'shadow foreign minister or ministers,' but for many, it became a sign that such discussions are being raised at high political levels. What do these events mean for Iran's diplomatic apparatus and for Mohammad Javad Zarif? How should we assess Qassem Soleimani's role in Iran's foreign policy? We have addressed these questions in this program.
Zarif or Soleimani; Which One is More Influential Today?
The article discusses the current influence of Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif compared to Qassem Soleimani. It highlights the tensions within Iran's political landscape, particularly regarding foreign policy, and suggests that discussions about 'shadow ministers' are prevalent among high-ranking officials. This situation is significant as it reflects ongoing power struggles within the Iranian government.
👥 Key Players
📰 What Happened
The article examines the influence of Mohammad Javad Zarif and Qassem Soleimani in Iran's foreign policy, highlighting internal tensions and the concept of 'shadow ministers.'
- Zarif's resignation and return to the Foreign Ministry were controversial.
- Soleimani's presence in Tehran with Assad, without Zarif's knowledge, underscores his influence.
💡 Why It Matters
📚 Background
Iran's foreign policy is shaped by both diplomatic efforts and military strategies, often leading to internal tensions between different power centers.
🏷️ Entities Mentioned
Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →
Translation confidence: 85%