Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی ✈️ Telegram EN فا
❓ Unknown

Joint Statement by a Group of Countries at the UN Human Rights Council; Respect the Rights of Iranian Women and Girls

Feb 6, 2026 February 6, 2026 3 min read 📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway

A coalition of over 40 countries, led by Canada, condemned Iran's 'Chastity and Hijab' law at the UN Human Rights Council, stating it exacerbates discrimination against women. They called for its immediate repeal and urged Iranian authorities to respect women's rights. This matter highlights ongoing international concern over human rights violations in Iran.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The international community is increasing pressure on Iran to respect women's rights, highlighting ongoing human rights concerns.

👥 Key Players

Canada MENTIONED
Leader of the coalition of countries
"Canada is taking a leadership role in international efforts to address human rights issues in Iran."
United States MENTIONED
Supporter of the joint statement
"The U.S. is a major global player and its support highlights the international concern over Iran's human rights practices."
Volker Turk MENTIONED
UN High Commissioner for Human Rights
"As the UN High Commissioner, Turk's statements carry significant weight in international human rights discourse."
Javide Rahman MENTIONED
UN Special Rapporteur on Iran
"Rahman monitors and reports on human rights in Iran, influencing international perspectives and actions."

📰 What Happened

A coalition of over 40 countries, led by Canada, condemned Iran's 'Chastity and Hijab' law at the UN Human Rights Council, urging its repeal and calling for respect for women's rights.

  • The 'Chastity and Hijab' law intensifies penalties for non-compliance with mandatory dress codes.
  • The statement expresses concern over the use of AI and digital surveillance against women.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: The statement increases international pressure on Iran to change its policies regarding women's rights.
🌍 Regional: It highlights ongoing tensions between Iran and Western countries, potentially influencing regional dynamics.
🌐 International: The issue underscores global concerns about human rights and gender equality, affecting international relations with Iran.

📚 Background

Iran's 'Chastity and Hijab' law is part of broader efforts by the Iranian government to enforce conservative dress codes, which have been met with significant domestic and international opposition.

Women's rights in Iran International human rights law
📡 Source: INTERNATIONAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The source reflects international perspectives on Iran's human rights practices, likely emphasizing Western views.

At the UN Human Rights Council meeting on Wednesday, a group of countries, led by Canada, issued a joint statement condemning the passage of the 'Chastity and Hijab' law by the Iranian Parliament. This statement, supported by at least 40 UN member countries including the United States, emphasizes that this law exacerbates systematic discrimination against Iranian women and worsens their conditions. The member countries pointed out that 'mandatory hijab' is a violation of women's rights and called for the immediate repeal of this law, urging Iranian authorities to respect the rights of Iranian women and girls and protect them against discrimination and repression. The statement adds that the Iranian Parliament significantly intensifies penalties for women and girls who do not comply with the 'oppressive mandatory dress codes' of the Iranian government, seeking to impose an unprecedented social and economic siege on 'non-compliant' women through travel bans, deprivation of education, access to healthcare, and other public services, while making it mandatory for private actors, including business owners. The statement also expressed grave concern over reports of the use of artificial intelligence and digital facial recognition technology for monitoring, arresting, and punishing women. The signatories of this statement asserted that women and girls in Iran should not be treated as second-class citizens and must enjoy their human rights free from discrimination, surveillance, and fear of punishment. The issuers of this statement concluded by stating that one year after the onset of the nationwide movement with the slogan 'Women, Life, Freedom,' they urge Iranian authorities to heed the legitimate demands of the protesters and adhere to their commitments under international law, including regarding women's rights and gender equality. Two weeks ago, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights also expressed regret over the passage of the 'stricter' hijab-related bill by the Iranian Parliament and the increase in prison penalties and heavy fines for non-compliance with mandatory hijab in Iran. Volker Turk, the High Commissioner for Human Rights, also called for the repeal of this 'oppressive' bill last week, emphasizing that it contradicts international laws. Javide Rahman, the UN Special Rapporteur monitoring Iran, recently described the status of women's rights in the Islamic Republic as 'gender apartheid' and called for international actions to hold human rights violators in Iran accountable. The repression and killing of protesters one year after the death of Mahsa in conversation with Michelle Taylor – Part 2. The Iran Human Rights Organization regarding Armita Garavand: The Islamic Republic has a long history of concealing crimes. Reactions to the 'Chastity and Hijab' bill in Iran | Critics: Unclear and discriminatory; Defenders: Critics are anti-family. In response to Javide Rahman's statements, the Islamic Republic accused him of 'supporting terrorism.' The U.S. criticism of the mandatory hijab law in Iran; a step backward for women's rights, human rights, and religious freedom. The High Commissioner for Human Rights: The 'oppressive' and 'humiliating' hijab bill in Iran should be repealed.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →