Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی ✈️ Telegram EN فا
❓ Unknown

Member of Parliament: No Breakthrough in House Arrests for Now

Jan 25, 2026 January 25, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

A member of the Iranian parliament stated that there will be no progress in lifting the house arrest of Green Movement leaders until they apologize. This comes after conflicting statements regarding the status of their house arrests, highlighting ongoing tensions within Iranian politics.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: Despite some signs of easing, the house arrests of Green Movement leaders remain a contentious issue in Iranian politics, with no immediate resolution in sight.

👥 Key Players

Mojtaba Zolnouri MENTIONED
Member of the Stability Front in Iranian Parliament
"Zolnouri is a conservative parliament member influential in shaping policies regarding political dissent."
Mehdi Karroubi MENTIONED
Green Movement Leader under house arrest
"Karroubi is a prominent opposition figure and former Speaker of the Iranian Parliament, symbolizing resistance to the current regime."
Mir Hossein Mousavi MENTIONED
Green Movement Leader under house arrest
"Mousavi is a key opposition leader and former Prime Minister, representing reformist aspirations in Iran."
Zahra Rahnavard MENTIONED
Green Movement Leader under house arrest
"Rahnavard is a political activist and academic, known for her reformist stance and as Mousavi's wife."
Hessameddin Ashna MENTIONED
Advisor to President Hassan Rouhani
"Ashna plays a role in communicating the government's stance on sensitive political issues like the house arrests."

📰 What Happened

A member of the Iranian parliament stated that there will be no progress in lifting the house arrest of Green Movement leaders until they apologize. This statement contradicts earlier optimistic remarks from a presidential advisor about the potential end of the house arrests.

  • Mojtaba Zolnouri insists no progress will occur without an apology from the detainees.
  • Hessameddin Ashna previously suggested that the house arrests were close to being lifted.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: The issue of house arrests is a significant point of contention between reformists and conservatives, reflecting broader struggles over political freedoms and reform in Iran.
🌍 Regional: The treatment of opposition figures in Iran can influence regional perceptions of governance and human rights.
🌐 International: Western countries often view the house arrests as a human rights issue, impacting Iran's international relations and image.

📚 Background

The Green Movement leaders have been under house arrest since 2011 following protests against the disputed 2009 presidential election results, symbolizing the ongoing struggle for political reform in Iran.

Iranian Green Movement Iranian political reform
📡 Source: NEUTRAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The article appears to provide a balanced view of the differing statements from Iranian political figures.

One day after the remarks of the Iranian President's advisor stating that only a shell remains until the lifting of the house arrest of the Green Movement leaders, a member of parliament said that currently there will be no "breakthrough" regarding their house arrest. Mojtaba Zolnouri, a member of the Stability Front in Parliament, emphasized in an interview with the Etemad website on Tuesday, December 10, that "as long as there is no apology from the detainees, there can be no expectations from the system." He added, "Currently, there will be no breakthrough regarding the house arrest because no positive action has been taken by those individuals." This conservative parliament member also stated that after Mehdi Karroubi's letter to Ayatollah Khamenei, "all breakthroughs" regarding the lifting of the house arrest have "hit a dead end." In the mentioned letter, Mehdi Karroubi held Ali Khamenei, the leader of the Islamic Republic, responsible for the current political, economic, cultural, and social situation in Iran and called for creating the grounds for structural reform of the system. Zolnouri had previously also stated that the lifting of the house arrest stopped after Karroubi's letter to the Supreme Leader. However, Hossein Karroubi, Mehdi Karroubi's son, rejected this claim and said that his mother had told security officials: "If there is sincerity in your words, then end the house arrest of Mr. Mousavi and Ms. Rahnavard, who have not written a letter." Previously, the families of Mir Hossein Mousavi and Zahra Rahnavard, as well as Mehdi Karroubi and several reformist political figures and members of parliament, criticized Hassan Rouhani for not pursuing the issue of house arrest. However, Hessameddin Ashna, an advisor to Hassan Rouhani, said in a speech on Sunday: "The conditions of the house arrest have changed; what should have happened by the government and the President as the head of the Supreme National Security Council has occurred." He referred to "some facilitations and breakthroughs" regarding the conditions of the house arrest and added that "only a shell remains until the lifting of the house arrest." Reports have emerged in recent months about the lifting of some restrictions on Mir Hossein Mousavi, Mehdi Karroubi, and Zahra Rahnavard. Events such as the meeting of Mehdi Karroubi's relatives with him during Nowruz, the "opening of welded windows" of Mir Hossein Mousavi and Zahra Rahnavard's home, and allowing them to meet with Mr. Mousavi's children and brother are among these occurrences. Ismail Doosti, a member of the National Trust Party, and Mojtaba Zolnouri, a member of the Stability Front in Parliament, have also met with Mehdi Karroubi at the place of his house arrest. Zahra Rahnavard reported in Ordibehesht that she had recently been verbally offered "limited right of movement" with the knowledge of the agents, which she rejected.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →