Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی ✈️ Telegram EN فا
❓ Unknown

Over 50 Professors from Sharif University Oppose Proposed Science Minister

Jan 27, 2026 January 27, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

Over 50 professors from Sharif University have expressed their opposition to Mansour Gholami's nomination as Minister of Science, urging parliament to consider academic opinions. This situation highlights ongoing tensions between the government and academic circles in Iran, particularly regarding the selection of qualified candidates for key positions.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The opposition to Gholami's nomination underscores significant tensions between the Iranian government and the academic community regarding leadership qualifications.

👥 Key Players

Mansour Gholami MENTIONED
Proposed Minister of Science
"His nomination reflects the government's approach to academic leadership and has sparked significant opposition from the academic community."
Hassan Rouhani MENTIONED
President of Iran
"As the head of the government, his nominations and policies directly influence the direction of higher education and science in Iran."
Sharif University of Technology Professors MENTIONED
Academic community members
"Their opposition signifies the disconnect between the government and academic institutions, highlighting concerns over qualifications and governance."
Mahmoud Sadeghi MENTIONED
Member of Parliament
"His shifting stance on Gholami's candidacy reflects the complexities of political support and academic concerns within the parliament."

📰 What Happened

Over 50 professors from Sharif University opposed Mansour Gholami's nomination as Minister of Science, urging parliament to prioritize academic qualifications. This opposition comes amid broader tensions between the government and the academic community.

  • The Ministry of Science has been without a permanent head since the beginning of the current government.
  • Protests occurred at universities against Gholami's nomination, indicating widespread discontent among students and faculty.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: This situation highlights the ongoing struggle for academic independence and the need for qualified leadership in Iran's educational institutions.
🌍 Regional: The outcome may affect Iran's scientific and technological development, which has implications for regional competitiveness.
🌐 International: International observers may view this as a reflection of Iran's internal governance challenges and the relationship between academia and the state.

📚 Background

In Iran, the selection of ministers, especially in education, often reflects broader political dynamics and the relationship between the government and academic institutions. Past controversies over ministerial appointments have led to significant political fallout.

Iranian higher education Government-academic relations in Iran
📡 Source: NEUTRAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The article presents a factual account of events without overt bias, focusing on the perspectives of the academic community and government actions.

With only one day left before the parliamentary session to review the proposed Minister of Science, more than 50 professors from Sharif University of Technology implicitly called on the parliament not to vote for Mansour Gholami in a letter to the parliamentary leadership and representatives. On Sunday, November 7, the parliament will decide on the qualifications of Mansour Gholami for the Ministry of Science and Reza Ardakaniyan for the Ministry of Energy. Mansour Gholami's nomination by Hassan Rouhani's government has faced widespread critical reactions in student and media circles. Now, these professors, by signing this letter, expressed their regret over what they called the government's and the President's indifference to the demands of academics, urging representatives to vote only for those who have "the necessary professional qualifications and acceptance among the majority of academics." Part of the letter states: "We are deeply sorry that there has been no attention from the esteemed government and especially the esteemed President to the demands of academics. Therefore, at this final stage of that esteemed parliament and its fair representatives from all political factions, we ask them to consider the opinions of academics when reviewing the qualifications of the candidate for the Ministry of Science and to only grant trust to an individual who has the necessary professional qualifications and acceptance among the majority of academics." Mansour Gholami is the president of Bu-Ali Sina University in Hamedan and holds a PhD in horticultural sciences from Australia. Previously, a group of student activists had warned Hassan Rouhani about the nomination of Mansour Gholami for the Ministry of Science in a statement. The Ministry of Science has been run by an acting head since the beginning of the twelfth government, and introducing a minister for this ministry has become one of the government's challenges. In this regard, Mahmoud Sadeghi, a representative from Tehran, reported that "according to relevant officials, the President has introduced more than 10 candidates for the Ministry of Science who have not been approved by the Leader." Rouhani's first government also had a controversial Ministry of Science, and after several candidates for this ministry were rejected by the ninth parliament, his first Minister of Science, Reza Faraji-Dana, was dismissed through impeachment. After him, that parliament did not vote for two other proposed candidates until Rouhani finally gained trust by introducing Mohammad Farhadi. Meanwhile, on Saturday, protests were held at universities in Tehran and several other cities against Rouhani's proposed minister. Previously, three representatives from the Hope faction, Mahmoud Sadeghi, Fatemeh Saeedi, and Jalal Mirzaei, had met with Mansour Gholami. Mahmoud Sadeghi and Fatemeh Saeedi, who were opponents of this candidate, announced after meeting him that they were convinced by the explanations of this proposed minister and supported him. Mahmoud Sadeghi also stated: "Before the meeting, I had a critical view of him" and "in the meeting, we clearly expressed all these criticisms, and he responded in detail. Our conclusion was that Gholami, if not the ideal candidate, could be acceptable."

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →